KODIAK -- Local fisherman Kurt Waters has been a part of the fishing community for about 24 years; he has given a lot to the fishery, including nearly the use of his hand.
Several years ago, as a crabber in the Bering Sea, he had the bright idea for an improvement to the crab-pot holding system.
“There are these air-dogs that usually hold the (crab) pot together,” Waters said. “We were breaking the dogs, so we put hydraulic dogs on it, bringing a little trawler mentality to the crab industry.”
The not-so-workable improvement ended up crushing his hand, costing him two fingers. The incident didn’t deter him from continuing the fishing life or his dream of someday owning his own boat.
Now he and fellow trawl fishermen are worried and frustrated.
They are worried that a series of proposals to limit or eliminate trawl fishing in Alitak Bay will be adopted by the Alaska Board of Fisheries.
If passed, trawl fishermen say the measures will have a tremendous economic impact on the Kodiak 40-vessel trawl fleet and the trawl community.
“In terms of the volume for the fleet, pollock is probably the biggest moneymaker,” said Julie Bonney, executive director of the Alaska Groundfish Data Bank in Kodiak. “As much as 70 percent of the 620 (fishing area) quota comes out of that bay. It’s a really important fishery area.”
Waters said that in 2006 he caught 7 million pounds of fish.
Fish and Game estimates pollock harvested from Alitak Bay in 2007 at 4.9 million pounds and 5.6 million in 2006. The largest harvest was 11.7 million in 2004.
“It’s not just the trawl fleet that benefits from the trawlers,” local fisherman Alvin Burch said. “Each vessel creates two days work for 140 people every time we deliver.”
Waters said the closure would represent just another of the dwindling areas where he and other trawlers can’t fish. There are already a number of closures because of the Steller sea lion habitat protection measures, which is one reason trawlers say they can’t relocate as easily as others might think.
“When they were discussing (the issue) at the meeting (and said), ‘Well, it will be easy for these guys to fish somewhere else,’ I meant what I said,” Waters said. “We wouldn’t be there if it was easy to catch fish somewhere else.”
Waters said it’s an expensive trip and takes 18 hours to get to the bay at a cost of 30 gallons of fuel per hour.
“The fleet has already given up a lot,” Bonney said. “There are just not a lot of other places to go.”
The series of proposals were originally brought before the Kodiak Fish Advisory Committee by Alexus Kwachka and Peter Hannah out of concern for what they believe is the last population of king crab on the island.
“In the pelagic trawl fishing (fleet) there is a great deal of fishing actually done on the bottom,” Kwachka said in his proposal. “Loss of crab due to contact with the pelagic trawl will continue and crab stocks in the area will be negatively impacted.”
Hannah believes the trawlers do more than harm king crabs.
“(There is) a high potential for salmon and herring bycatch by pelagic trawl gear in Deadman’s Bay on Kodiak Island,” Hannah wrote in his proposal. “Salmon escapement and successful directed fisheries in Deadman’s Bay will be hindered due to bycatch associated with pelagic trawling and incidental bycatch of herring will continue to affect these stocks.”
Waters, Burch and Bonney said they understand the public’s concern, but believe the proposals are based on emotion, not science.
Conservation groups around the world are nearly unanimous in their condemnation of the large trawlers and have published hundreds of reports condemning their environmental impact. Greenpeace, which has led the charge against trawling vessels for years, says trawlers strip-mine the ocean and demolish ocean’s ecosystem around the world.
Other environmental groups, such as Oceana and the Marine Conservation Biology Institute, also issued publications critical of trawlers.
The issue is just as emotional in Kodiak, as evidenced by several recent letters to the editor.
“I guess the question is going to be, Is the board going to react to emotion and politics or are they going to look at the scientific information in terms of doing the right thing?” Bonney asked. “Pollock fishing is a very clean fishery and it’s sustainable.”
Burch agreed in his Jan. 8 letter to the editor.
“It’s important that people know that just because someone says something is true about trawl fishing, doesn’t mean that it is true,” he wrote.
What is the truth?
In the last 18 years, two studies have been done on the effects of trawl gear on king crabs, one in 1990 and the other in 1996. The results of the two studies concluded that the effect was minimal.
In the 1990 study by Fish and Game researcher William Donaldson, Donaldson tethered a group of hard-shell red king crabs on the ocean’s bottom, then proceeded to run over the group with trawl gear six times.
The study was done to gauge the impact of “trawl gear on injury rates of crab that were in the trawl path but not caught by the gear.”
According to the study, of the 114 crabs recovered, five of the crabs sustained injuries and only one had injuries estimated as fatal.
Rose’s study was similar.
“Unobserved mortality is a significant concern as one of the incidental effects of fishing,” he wrote in his study. “In addition to direct bycatch and habitat effects, unobserved mortality has been one of the justifications used by managers for closing large areas to bottom trawling.”
In the experiment, Rose studied the rate of injuries to red king crabs after the passage of several different types of trawl gear.
Injury rates of 5, 7 and 10 percent were estimated for crabs passing under the three commercial trawl footropes.
The number of crabs captured in each tow varied from 34 to 233. Of these, 82 to 98 percent showed no signs of injury.
Rose said the two studies are a good beginning, but more research is needed.
He hopes a study he is currently working on will shed more light on the subject.
“The difference in this new study is it’s going to be set up to estimate mortality, as opposed to just looking at injuries,” Rose said.
In the study, to be completed later this year, researchers will hold crabs that have come in contact with trawl gear for up to a week to better determine the effects of the gear on crabs. The study will help gauge longer term effects of trawl gear.
“Another difference is this will not be just behind the footrope,” Rose said. “It will also be behind the trawl and beside the trawl. Also, we’ll be doing snow king and Tanner crab.”
The proposals were not just concerned with trawl gear effects on crabs, but also with the effect of bycatch on other fish populations in the area such as halibut, salmon, herring, Pacific cod and Tanner crab.
According to a report generated by Fish and Game, an average of 22 vessels each year fish inside Alitak Bay.
“All Pacific salmon, Pacific herring, Tanner crab and king crab are considered prohibitive species in the pelagic trawl fishery,” the report stated. “In the Gulf of Alaska, these species are required to be returned to the water and reported on fish ticket records.”
From 2004 to 2007 pollock harvests totaled approximately 24.3 million pounds in Alitak Bay. Based on both fish ticket data and observer data, the average bycatch was less than 5 percent.
Fish ticket data had Pacific herring bycatch estimated at 1.2 percent and observer data estimated the bycatch at 0.9 percent. Fish ticket data showed Pacific herring bycatch at 1.2 percent and observer data recorded the bycatch as 1.5 percent.
King crab bycatch for the same time was estimated, based on observer data, as 59 pounds and 179 pounds for Tanner crabs.
The difference in fish ticket data and observer data leads some people to believe that more observers are necessary on trawlers. In the final proposal under consideration by the board, the proposal would require 100 percent observer data on trawl vessels inside the bay.
Trawlers balk at the idea, saying it’s too expensive, as the trawler fleet will have to pay the bill.
“I’ve got the bill right here in my hand,” Burch said. “For the month of the October, for (my boat) the Dawn, Oct. 1 and 2 $315 a day. I got credit for one observer day and paid for two because of travel.”
He did much the same for Oct. 10-12, paying $315 a day and getting credit for only one day.
“My final bill was $2,095,” Burch said.
Fish and Game supports the idea of full observer data because it would increase their knowledge base on bycatch, and also because the “Office of Law Enforcement for NMFS indicates that fishing behavior of pelagic trawl fleet is different when vessels have observer coverage.”
Not so, said NMFS special agent in charge Ken Hanson.
In fact, he said he has no idea where that statement came from.
“I don’t know who reportedly made that statement,” Hanson said. “I don’t know how or where that came from. This is totally a state issue; we don’t regulate trawling in Alitak Bay.”
In the end, Waters and the rest of the Kodiak trawling community just want a fair hearing, one based on facts and not emotion.
And if the bay is closed?
“We’ll adapt,” Waters said. “It’ll be hard, it’ll hurt, but we’ll adapt.” -- Kodiak Daily Mirror
Oregon marine protected areas still talk
In follow-up to a Nov. 1 meeting between Governor Ted Kulongoski and fishermen, crabbers and charter boat operators, the governor scheduled Chief of Staff Chip Terhune to lead discussions regarding marine reserves and wave energy efforts.
Kulongoski indicated during the meeting the "conversation was not over," Kulongoski's Acting Communications Director Patty Wentz said.
Terhune is to visit several cities along the coast.
"Governor Kulongoski made it very clear no marine reserve will be created without local engagement," Wentz remarked. "Nor will any be created that negatively impact the Oregon coast economy. The conversations we are having now are important to insure those values are upheld."
Lincoln City recently supported the governor's efforts though a resolution it passed in December. The resolution recognized marine reserves as being a "proven management tool" to protect the ocean's ecosystems; sided with the Ocean Policy Advisory Council's (OPAC) 2002 recommendation to create reserves to determine if conservation objectives can be met; and also sided with OPAC to create no more than 10 reserve sites large enough for scientific study, but limited enough not to endanger the ocean's economic contributions.
Marine reserves have been met with resistance by many in the fishing and charter business due to the potential economic impact on the industry. These discussions are to further dialogue between these industries, local governments and Kulongoski's office. Newport News-Times
Washington poacher gets jail time
A judge sentenced a former Olympia man to a year in prison Thursday for illegally fishing on Nisqually tribal lands in a case that pitted state law against tribal code.
It doesn't appear that Larry P. Guidry Jr., 41, will serve additional time because Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Pomeroy ordered that the sentence run concurrent with a prison term Guidry has been serving since 2006.
He will, however, have another felony conviction on a lengthy criminal record and be ordered to pay $10,000 in restitution to the state Department of Fish and Wildlife.
On Wednesday, Pomeroy found Guidry guilty of 11 crimes for the illegal fishing and selling of commercial quantities of fish without a license or endorsement from Fish and Wildlife.
In December 2005, Fish and Wildlife officers saw Guidry, a non-Nisqually tribal member, catching chum salmon during a tribal fishery. At issue was whether his wife, Lorena, an enrolled member of the Nisqually Indian tribe, needed to be present for him to legally participate in the fishery.
In June 2006, Guidry pleaded guilty in separate criminal cases in Thurston County Superior Court.
In one case, he was sentenced to 24 months in prison for illegal possession of methamphetamine and two counts of illegal possession of stolen property, which occurred in December 2005. In the other case, he was sentenced to 33 months in prison for first-degree theft, which occurred in May 2006.
He was transported from the Stafford Creek Corrections Center in Aberdeen to Thurston County Jail to be arraigned on the illegal-fishing charges in early September.
He has been at the jail since and will return to prison soon. He will receive credit for the time served in jail.
Guidry was convicted of one count of first-degree engaging in fish-dealing activity without a license; one count of first-degree illegal trafficking in fish, shellfish or wildlife; four counts of participation of a non-Indian in Indian fishery for commercial purpose; four counts of first-degree unlicensed commercial fishing; and one count of obstructing a law enforcement officer. The Olympian, Washington
California black abalone nearly extinct
"The scientific review team reported major declines in the population of black abalone, especially in the areas around the Channel Islands off Southern California," said Rod McInnis, Southwest Regional Administrator for NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service.
"These proposed regulations seek federal protection for black abalone and request input from the public in determining what areas might be included as critical habitat for the species."
Black abalone were once plentiful in the intertidal waters from Northern Baja California, Mexico, to Monterey, Calif., although there is some scientific debate about how far north the population once extended. The species was utilized by early California natives and peaked as a commercial fishery in the state in 1973 with almost two million pounds harvested.
Since the 1980s, black abalone abundance has plummeted primarily from a bacterial disease known as withering syndrome. Other causes of the rapid population decline are likely due to historical overfishing, poaching and natural predation.
NMFS has considered recent preliminary evidence which suggests a small disease resistant population may exist at San Nicolas Island. Even with this possibility, the likelihood that black abalone populations will continue to decline towards extinction (within the next 30 years) is very high. Science Daily