pf home
Summary for July 2 - July 6, 2007:

Monday, July 2, 2007

News: Crew of Overdue Fishing Boat Found Safe

KODIAK, Alaska – The 2007 commercial salmon season is well under way for the Kodiak
Island area, but the fish just aren’t showing up.

Reports from Kodiak docks indicate that although the salmon season is slow, fishermen remain hopeful the salmon will come in.

A crewmember from the fishing vessel Viking Star said a good catch may be as close as the next tide.

Alaska Department of Fish and Game catch reports concur with dock talk.

Chum catches at Kitoi Bay hatchery are picking up a little, but the Westside fishery for sockeye is slow, Fish and Game fisheries biologist Jeff Wadle said.

Wadle is hopeful pink salmon catches will pick up in July.

Fish and Game’s next fishery announcement for a general opening is July 6 for the start of the pink salmon run.

“Until then, pretty much everything that is open will stay open and everything that is closed will stay closed,” Wadle said.

The Alitak District may open if sockeye escapements start to pick up, but escapements currently are low.

“We’re waiting for those fish to show up in the Alitak District,” Wadle said.

Bristol Bay

There are five different fishing districts in Bristol Bay run out of two offices. The King Salmon office regulates salmon fisheries in Naknek, Kvichak, Egegik and Ugashik. The Westside office regulates the Nushagak and Togiak districts out of Dillingham.

“We can have totally different scenarios on the two different sides,” Fish and Game Westside assistant area biologist Charlotte Westing said.

Westside area biologist Tim Sands said the area is ahead on its escapements.

“We’re catching fish, so it’s all good,” Sands said.

Fishing started in the Westside Monday, and in three days of fishing, 850,000 sockeye have been taken, Sands said.

Setnet and drift gillnet gear is used in this fishery.

“Driftnet is the biggest component,” Sands said.

The Nushagak District had a good forecast of 214,000 king salmon, but it didn’t materialize.

“The escapement fell behind expectations so we had to curtail our schedule, and at this point we’re still late on the kings,” Sands said.

He is optimistic the kings will show up.

Paul Salomone is an Eastside Fish and Game area biologist and regulates Egegik and Ugashik districts out of the Eastside office.

Fishing in Ugashik has not started, but Egegik is entering the high-abundance part of the season, Salomone said.

The preseason forecast for Egegik is 9.2 million sockeye, giving the area an 8.1 million fish harvestable surplus.

The preseason forecast for Ugashik is 4.18 million fish with a harvestable surplus of 3.33 million.

Naknek/Kvichak area manager Slim Morstad also manages out of the Eastside office. He said Naknek is doing well but Kvichak is several days behind.

“We’re going in river starting at 11 a.m. this morning,” Morstad said.

He means the fleet of more than 220 vessels will fish a small area in the Naknek River only, instead of the rest of the district where there is a lot of room.

“This district used to have a thousand boats,” Morstad said. “That’s what happens when the Kvichak isn’t doing it and everybody fishes elsewhere.”

He said, although the Kvichak escapement is doing poorly, fishermen are doing OK, taking in 100,000 fish Wednesday in the Naknek section.

Kodiak Daily Mirror

News: SF Bay Salmon Release Raises Ire

State Fish and Game hatchery crews have deposited more than 20 million salmon smolts in the bay this year, most of them at a site in the East Bay town of Rodeo in what amounts to a dinner-bell program for striped bass.

Controversy engulfing the fingerling release strategy, or lack of one, is at full boil, and a state official promises improvements.

Charter skippers and others are angry that dumping the smolts in the same part of the bay at just about the same time, day after day, makes them easy prey for striped bass.

The bass in turn become easy prey for sport anglers.

Commercial fishermen, whose salmon tax pays for the release of 4 million jumbo smolts each year, are especially upset.

Tempers flared last week, when five or six charter boats convened off Rodeo, loaded with anglers as state crews pumped smolts into the bay, triggering a feeding frenzy involving stripers and diving birds, as well as scores of anglers who hauled away limits of striped bass.

In short, it was a pathetic situation, bad for the salmon fishery, bad for the striper fishery.

The smolts are released about noon on weekdays in an area striped bass have learned to frequent for an easy meal.

"It's a stupid way to plant those fish," said Keith Fraser of Loch Lomond Live Bait in San Rafael, summing up the view of many. "It makes no sense."

Trevor Kennedy, executive director of the Fishery Foundation of California, said that a foundation staffer usually arrives in concert with the Fish and Game crew, and puts the smolts in a pen which the foundation tows to deeper water for release.

Last week, a staffer called in sick, so the smolts were dumped directly off the dock, as they are any time the pen crew isn't available. Result: a salmon smolt slaughter, followed by a striper slaughter as anglers moved in on the bass.

"When we get the smolts in our net pen, we pull them to the main channel," Kennedy said. "It really does work well."

But he acknowledged that striped bass seem to know that the arrival of a net pen means a meal is not far away, and that the towing program doesn't eliminate the predator problem.

Greg Hurner, a senior advisor to state Fish and Game chief Ryan Broddrick, said 20.1 million smolts raised at the Feather River, Mokelumne and Nimbus hatcheries have been released this year, most at the Rodeo site. About 500,000 more smolts at the hatcheries await release this year.

The Rodeo site is used most often because "it's easy access for us," Hurner said.

Although an occasional delivery is made elsewhere, a site in Benicia poses water quality problems, and access to a Treasure Island site is difficult. Romberg Center's Tiburon depot, where the Tyee Club raises salmon, has not been used.

Even though schools of striped bass gorge on smolts at Rodeo, the fingerlings are more likely to survive than they would be if they were released at the hatcheries and forced to run the Northern California river system gauntlet, Hurner said.

"The whole program to move the fish to the bay is good for the fishery, in terms of survivability," he said.

But that doesn't mean it can't be improved. Rotating releases of smolts among more bay sites, at different times of day - and night - would seem to be a logical step, even if it cost a bit more and meant a more complicated schedule for the staff.

"That's an option, a decision our supervisors are going to have to kick around," said Armando Quinones, a senior Fish and Game hatchery supervisor.

Rodeo is an ideal locale from logistical and budget perspectives, he said. The 2,800-gallon, 30-foot tractor trucks that haul 130,000 smolts are filled at the hatcheries first thing in the morning to accommodate staff schedules and must proceed rapidly with their fragile cargo. The trucks arrive before noon daily at the spacious Rodeo site during the spring. Hauling the fish to other sites, such as Tiburon, could add a couple hours to the trip, generating extra costs, Quinones noted.

Smaller trucks are available to handle access problems, but "smaller trucks create more trips" and thus generate overtime costs, Quinones said.

Quinones pledged to see if the $3.2 million smolt program can be revised to accommodate concerns in the fishing community.

"Perhaps we could send more trucks to Treasure Island more often," Quinones reflected after a lengthy, candid interview. "We'll do everything in our power to make things a little better."

As Roy Ritola of Mill Valley put it, "If this practice doesn't stop immediately - the persons responsible need to be replaced."

Marine Independent Journal

News: Russians Say They Own the North Pole

MOSCOW – Russian President Vladimir Putin is making an astonishing bid to grab a vast chunk of the Arctic - so he can tap its vast potential oil, gas and mineral wealth.

His scientists claim an underwater ridge near the North Pole is really part of Russia's continental shelf.

One newspaper printed a map of the "new addition," a triangle five times the size of Britain with twice as much oil as Saudi Arabia.

The dramatic move provoked an international outcry. The U.S. and Canada expressed shock and environment campaigners said it would be a disaster.

Observers say the move is typical of Putin's muscle flexing as he tries to increase Russian power.

Under current international law, the countries ringing the Arctic - -Russia, Canada, the U.S., Norway, and Denmark (which owns Greenland) - are limited to a 200-mile economic zone around their coasts.

UN convention says none can claim jurisdiction over the Arctic seabed because the geological structure does not match the surrounding continental shelves.

But Russian scientists have returned from a six-week mission on a nuclear ice-breaker to claim that the 1,220-mile long underwater Lomonosov Ridge is geologically linked to the Siberian continental platform - and similar in structure.

The region is currently administered by the International Seabed Authority but this is now being challenged by Moscow.

Experts estimate the ridge has ten billion tons of gas and oil deposits and significant sources of diamonds, gold, tin, manganese, nickel, lead and platinum.

A Russian attempt to claim Arctic territory was rejected five years ago, but this time Moscow plans to make a far more serious submission to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. A British diplomatic source warned that Russia was planning to secure its grip on oil and gas supplies "for decades to come."

Daily Mail, UK

Editorial: Alaska Food Conference was Brilliant

Nothing like this has ever happened in Alaska before - but it should.

The Global Food Alaska 2007 event put producers, harvesters, packagers and transporters all together under one roof to see how they can better connect the food chain in the state.

The concept was to "create more efficiencies and effectiveness along Alaska's supply of food," according to Robin Richardson, president of Global Food Collaborative LLC and organizer of the event.

"A lot of people are coming up to address that issue and there are a lot of people participating who want to find solutions."

The conference was open to major commercial and institutional buyers, such as Alaska school districts and the Alaska Marine Highway System, to smaller businesses and organizations, like restaurants, hotels and bed-and-breakfast operators, plus suppliers of all kinds. Exhibitors served as hosts.

What a brilliant idea. In fact, there should be more of this taking place in our community.

It isn't just food and beverage buyers and sellers who struggle with the cost of moving their products in Alaska and Outside, there are many businesses who share the stress of looking for cost effective ideas and solutions.

More than 300 of them gathered for the event. It even included some "celebrities" - the Bering Sea crabbing skippers who have become popular figures nationwide as a result of the Discovery Channel show, Deadliest Catch.

The captains offered to come and share the other side of crab fishing and their roles working in the seafood industry. It isn't exactly what you see on TV.

Larry Hendricks, captain of the Sea Star in one season of the reality show, said he was interested in letting people know crab fishing is a sustainable and renewable industry being challenged by crab from other countries.

"Foreign importers are selling back to America crab caught by fishermen from other places - such as Russia - that aren't held to the same standards, so we'd like to see crab become a certified fish product, similar to the way Angus beef is a certified beef product," he said.

Rick Roeske, program manager for Cook Inlet Salmon Brand, another sponsor of the event, summed up the event well, saying it served as a valuable opportunity to learn from each other and collaborate on ways to maximize generating sustainable business and economic developments from Alaska's bounty.

"People Outside are kind of removed from the food source, but this gives national and international buyers a chance to visit Alaska, sit down and ask questions about the process from harvest to market. And, with it being closed to the public, sellers and buyers can - in a no stress environment - discuss what is done, negotiate prices and strike deals," Roeske said.

It wasn't a public event, although the doors were opened for part of the conference.

What's important is the ones who needed the answers and wanted to make connections had two days to do so.

Actually, it's hard to believe no one has done this here before now. We have the ways, means and amenities to provide such conferences, and we need to be doing this more often. It not only benefits those directly involved, but it trickles down into all of the communities - especially when the result of the event is a success.

Sponsors say the next Global Food Alaska conference won't take place until 2009.

Hopefully it won't be that long before we see another great concept come to fruition.

Peninsula Clarion, Soldotna, Alaska

News: House Panel to Probe Cheney-Klamath Connections

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee said his panel will hold a hearing into the role Vice President Dick Cheney may have played in the 2002 die-off of about 70,000 salmon near the California-Oregon border.

Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., said the Democratic-led committee has been examining what he called the Bush administration's "penchant to favor politics over science in the implementation of the Endangered Species Act."

In light of allegations made about Cheney's role in developing a 10-year water plan for the Klamath River that courts later called arbitrary and in violation of the Endangered Species Act, a hearing is worthwhile, Rahall said. He and other Democrats charged that Cheney's action resulted in the largest adult salmon kill in the history of the West.

"It certainly appears this administration will stop at nothing to achieve political gain from natural resources disasters," Rahall said. "Ultimately, it will be hardworking Americans and their healthy environment that will lose if we fail to act."

West Coast Democrats called for the hearing Wednesday after the Washington Post reported that Cheney may have played a key role in the 2002 salmon die-off.

"The ramifications of that salmon kill are still being felt today as returns to the Klamath River are so low that commercial, sport and tribal fishing seasons have been curtailed for the past three years," 36 House Democrats said in a letter to Rahall calling for the hearing.

Commercial fishing in California and Oregon was cut by more than 90 percent last year — the largest commercial fishing closure in the history of the country — resulting in more than $60 million in damage to coastal economies, the letter said.

Megan McGinn, a spokeswoman for the vice president's office, said late Wednesday she had not seen the letter and could not comment.

The salmon die-off and water usage in the drought-plagued Klamath Basin have long been a source of political controversy. In 2004, the Interior Department's inspector general found no basis for a claim by Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry that White House political advisers interfered in developing water policy in the Klamath.

The inspector general said President Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, was not involved in a 2002 decision to divert water from the Klamath River in Oregon to irrigate farms.

Three months after Rove's meeting in early 2002, administration officials increased the water supply to more than 200,000 acres of farmland in California and Oregon — a decision bitterly opposed by environmentalists and commercial fishermen.

In September 2002, tens of thousands of Chinook salmon died in the Klamath River in Northern California. The California Department of Fish and Game laid much of the blame on low water flows controlled by the federal government, saying it created conditions that allowed a fatal gill-rot disease to spread through the fish.

- Seattle Times

<<<•>>>

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

News: China's Seafood Industry Must Up Safety Standards

TAOYU, China -- This tiny village near the Great Wall is crowded with 20 household trout farms, which have cropped up in less than a decade to join China's booming seafood trade.

Yet, in a tale mirrored across the industry, the local water supply could not keep pace and fish began dying from contamination, said fish farmer Liu Yanyan. She turned to traditional Chinese medicine to save her trout, she said, while some neighbors resorted to antibiotics and other chemicals.

In trying to protect their business, China's fish farmers may have fueled a far larger problem: China's seafood industry, the world's largest source of farmed fish, is the latest casualty in a wave of scrutiny that threatens to undermine the nation's reputation as the superstore to the world. The case highlights a vulnerability in China's economy: the government's challenge to keep pace with growth to ensure that exporters meet health and safety standards in markets around the globe.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Thursday moved to block the sale of five types of Chinese farm-raised seafood found to be contaminated by unapproved drugs and additives. China did not hide its displeasure, calling the move "indiscriminate" and "unacceptable."

The partial food ban came after a string of reports in recent months about Chinese exports failing to meet safety standards on pet food additives, toothpaste, toy trains and tires.

But the seafood crackdown could be particularly troublesome for China, experts say. Not only is China the largest foreign source of U.S. seafood -- contributing more than a fifth of imports -- but seafood is a particularly vivid new reason for U.S. consumers to take notice.

"There will be significant damage in terms of American consumers' willingness to experiment with Chinese products," predicted Tom Doctoroff, chief executive of greater China for advertising agency JWT.

"If people are starting to ask, 'I don't know how they make products in China. I'm concerned about what goes into them,' that could be a big blow," Doctoroff said.

The drumbeat of import actions has become a problem larger than it seemed in April, when U.S. regulators first suspected that two Chinese companies intentionally mixed an industrial chemical, melamine, with wheat flour in order to boost protein readings in a pet food additive.

Less than 90 days later, an economy that ships more than $30 billion a year in food and drugs to Asia, North America and Europe is facing a potential crisis of confidence that could stretch beyond consumable products and begin to hit the few branded goods that China offers, whether appliances from Haier or personal computers from Lenovo.

"China's climb up the branded-products ladder is not going to be smooth," Doctoroff said. "They've just been brought down one rung."

Public-relations offensive

China has adopted an increasingly vigorous defense. After responding coolly to earlier import actions, Li Changjiang, director of the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine was quoted by state media as saying, "China cannot accept the indiscriminate and automatic detention of four kinds of Chinese seafood by the United States."

In a phone call Friday with U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, Li reportedly said that China has detected a range of tainted products from the U.S. as well but has not imposed broad restrictions. Li, head of China's food safety agency, also said China has already taken unspecified steps to address U.S. concerns on seafood, according to the Xinhua news agency.

Indeed, China is working to restore confidence. The Chinese Embassy in Washington last week released a flood of statistics designed to convey that, despite the latest incidents, "99 percent of Chinese food exports meet applicable standards" in more than 200 countries.

The head of the Chinese food and drug regulator has been sentenced to death for accepting bribes and failing to curb fake and unsafe medicines. And state media revealed last week that authorities have closed 180 foodmakers found to be mixing additives such as mineral oils, paraffin wax, industrial dyes, formaldehyde and the cancer-causing agent malachite green into the production of biscuits, melon seeds, bean curd, seafood, flour, candy and pickles, according to a report in the state-run China Daily newspaper.

Thursday's import alert affecting Chinese catfish, shrimp, dace, eel and a catfish-related fish called basa comes after investigators and U.S. lobbyists raised questions about Chinese seafood. The FDA began scrutinizing Chinese imports soon after European and Chinese regulators in 2002 found residues of the antibiotic chloramphenicol in shrimp exports. Since then the FDA and Canadian authorities have raised occasional alarms about banned substances in Chinese seafood.

In repeated tests over the past seven months, the FDA found residues of unapproved drugs and food additives in Chinese seafood exports. Thursday's order was issued, the FDA said, because the agency found that the problem "is endemic throughout a country."

The contaminants -- including malachite green, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurans and gentian violet, which are used to inhibit parasite or fungus growth -- are below levels that could cause immediate harm to consumers, the FDA said, but long-term exposure could cause cancer. Fluoroquinolones in food animals also can increase antibiotic resistance, the agency said.

The seafood ban has long been sought after by the U.S. shrimp and catfish industries. Both groups have complained bitterly about the rising shipments of cheaper shrimp and catfish from China and other Asian countries, such as Thailand and Vietnam.

Imports up sharply

Seafood consumption has jumped dramatically in the U.S., rising from about 3.5 billion pounds in 1995 to more than 4.5 billion pounds in 2006. Imported seafood makes up about 80 percent of the U.S. supply, and most of that comes from Asia.

Shrimp is the most popular seafood in America, with imports in 2006 reaching 1.3 billion pounds.

Despite obvious food safety concerns, it is difficult to ignore the protectionist nature of the FDA seafood ban. The shrimp industry, in particular, has been hard hit by cheaper imports.

The U.S. shrimp industry has begun an advertising campaign that promotes the wild shrimp captured in southern U.S. waters, hoping to cast it in a favorable light against the pond-raised shrimp from Asia.

Eddie Gordon, executive director of the Wild American Shrimp campaign, said while sales are a primary concern, his group's members also are worried that an illness from foreign shrimp will leave consumers leery of all shrimp, domestic or imported.

"It's going to protect not only our consumers' health, which is primary, but also it's protecting our seafood industry," Gordon said of the FDA move.

The catfish industry, which is centered in Mississippi and Alabama, had turned to its state governments for help. Agriculture officials in both states have launched aggressive campaigns to test frozen catfish from China.

There is no evidence that the potential for food-borne illness was behind the FDA's decision. Instead, agency officials said tests showed that a quarter of the shrimp imported from China contained antibiotics not allowed in U.S. food production.

"We're taking this strong step because of current and continuing evidence that certain Chinese aquaculture products imported into the United States contain illegal substances that are not permitted in seafood sold in the United States," said Dr. David Acheson, the FDA's assistant commissioner for food protection.

The FDA's order, which is effective immediately, allows companies importing seafood to conduct tests to show the FDA that its seafood is clean of the banned substances.

Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, said that aspect of the FDA's ban is troublesome, as tests could be conducted in China. The agency's food safety standards, she said, are well behind those of the European Union, which inspects more imported seafood.

"The EU has very strict regulations," Hauter said. "They inspect 20 to 50 percent of seafood, depending on the species. ... The FDA is very far behind."

Currently, the FDA inspects about 1 percent of all imported food as it arrives.

Peril of furious growth

The addition of seafood to the list of affected products has exacerbated the perception that China's fast-growing economy is outpacing regulators and safe ingredients. And like any brand, China will have to repair public confidence.

"These issues are endemic of the fast growth of China," said Scott Kronick, president of Ogilvy PR China. "Things are getting through the system that normally they would have control over."

In the mountains outside Beijing, the rapid rise of aquaculture is unmistakable. The first tiny fish farms, each composed of a dozen or so cascading concrete pools, appeared in 2001, fed by the pure waters of what locals call Pearl Spring.

But by today, so many households had joined the business that water was being diverted into pipes and canals, warming in the sun and making the area's rainbow and brook trout more vulnerable to infection. Producers in that area do not yet have licenses to export to the United States, so the fish is sold on domestic markets.

Liu, the 52-year-old owner of Zhongjia Brook Trout Breeding Ground, has urged authorities to help small-scale fish farmers finance filter systems that would prevent further contamination without using drugs.

"Individual fisherman don't have enough money for facilities such as water treatment," she said. The farm, which she operates with her brother Liu Jianping, has been chosen to host a filtering pilot project this fall. In the meantime, they say they use only traditional herbal remedies, though they routinely see other operators beef up fish feed with agents such as ciprofloxacin, fluoroquinolones and malachite green.

"The government has banned some drugs, but there are no good drugs," said Liu Jianping. "So the farmers have no choice. They can't just watch the fish die."

Chicago Tribune

News: B.C. Salmon Farms Await Final Approval

VANCOUVER ISLAND - A new salmon farm approved for Concepcion Point on the west coast of Vancouver Island may not be the last to get the green light before the B.C. government releases its new aquaculture plan next year.

Agriculture Minister Pat Bell said there have been few new applications for salmon farms since a special legislative committee was set up in 2005. But there are 18 applications on file, mostly for two years or more, and once they are verified as complete, Bell said he is obligated to make a decision.

The Concepcion Point application, by Grieg Seafood B.C. was approved in late May, four years after applying. Bell said its approval is not a sign that he has rejected the conclusion by the legislative committee’s NDP majority that B.C. salmon farms should go to ocean-based closed containment fish farms within five years.

“That in no way should indicate that I’m not taking the special legislative committee’s report seriously,” Bell said. “I have had staff doing extensive work on the analysis of that report. They’ve provided some initial reviews to me. I’ll be taking that forward to cabinet in the coming months for review and tabling a formal fin-fish aquaculture plan for British Columbia, hopefully for next fall.”

B.C. has one experiment underway using floating concrete tanks to raise Chinook salmon, an effort to cut off fish escapes and transfer of sea lice or disease to the open ocean and wild salmon. B.C. Liberal members of the committee refused to support the recommendation to make closed containment mandatory, and Bell questioned whether an untested technology could be developed and put in place in five years.

Goldstream News Gazette

News: Salmon Commands Pretty Price

SNOHOMISH COUNTY - This is a story that could become a whopper of a tale that's swapped at bars after a long day of fishing.

Spring 2007 will be known as a time when Tulalip fishermen were pulling Chinook salmon out of the bay — and selling them for $6 a pound.

Years from now, that's the part that will likely garner a chorus of disbelief — "$6 a pound? In early June?"

Typically, fishermen expect about $1.25 a pound that early in the season.

But it's true, and the tribal commercial fishermen on the Tulalip Reservation can vouch for it.

Thanks largely to Chinook returning earlier, commercial fishermen were catching more fish this spring and selling them at a better price.

"Six dollars a pound — that's the best ever," said fish buyer John Burke, who works for Port Angeles-based High Tide Seafoods.

The secret to the fishermen's recent boon lies about four miles from the Tulalip Marina at the tribal hatchery, which releases millions of salmon into Tulalip Bay each year.

Four years ago, the hatchery took a risk.

It started releasing Chinook that would return earlier in the season, rather than a type that returns in the fall, as it had done for more than two decades.

The decision was made largely for environmental reasons. Chinook returning in May or June rather than September and October would mix better with the local wild Chinook in the Skykomish River system — a key piece of salmon recovery, said Mike Crewson, a fisheries-enhancement biologist who works with the Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Department.

A majority of the tribes' salmon catch is hatchery fish — for Chinook, it's up to 95 percent.

The fish also are in better condition when they return earlier in the fishing season because they have built up energy reserves to last them until they spawn several months later.

Chinook are genetically programmed to return at different times to their home streams after traveling hundreds of miles in seasonal migrations.

They're able to navigate back from foreign waters and recognize the odor of their home streams once they're close.

"They have a genetic compass and a map," said Crewson.

When hatchery officials decided to start releasing summer Chinook, they weren't completely sure what would happen. The survival rate of the earlier-returning fish was a worry.

"Releasing them directly into saltwater and bypassing the estuary is not what the natural fish evolved to do," said Crewson.

Seven years ago, the hatchery began studying the survival rate of summer Chinook. In 2003, it switched to 90 percent summer Chinook. So far, the transition has been smooth.

There's no hard-and-fast time frame for when the fish will return, but usually it's between three and five years, which means this is the first year the hatchery is seeing large numbers of early-returning fish.

By 2006, about 22 percent of returning fish were summer Chinook. This year, about 91 percent of returning fish were summer Chinook. By 2009, the hatchery expects 100 percent of its Chinook to return in the summer.

For the tribes, this means a lot more fish a lot earlier.

"We had good fishing opportunities the last couple weeks of May, and that's unheard of," said Crewson.

It also means tribal commercial fishermen have been beating competitors from places like Oregon, California and Chile in getting fish to market, grabbing far higher prices than are usually available this time of year.

Since the early June spike of $6 a pound, prices have been hovering between $3 and $4 a pound, said Burke. What also helped commercial fishermen this year is the drought of other fish on the market, decreasing the amount of competition.

"At this time two years ago, if we caught one, we'd bring it home [instead of selling it]," said commercial fisherman Cy Fryberg. "It's only going to get better."

The early-returning Chinook also have provided another benefit. Typically, the Tulalip Tribes' First Salmon Ceremony has had to rely partly on fish from elsewhere to have enough for the spiritual celebration. But this year, the June 23 ceremony was 100 percent stocked with fish caught from the tribes' home waters.

"That is more important than anything else, the cultural significance of that — there's no dollar sign to put on that," said Crewson.

Seattle Times

News: Critics Take Swipes at Fishery Council

The Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council lives with controversy; it is the nature of its mission. The council interacts with community groups and diverse interests. Its allies and opponents are continuously shifting, depending on the issues before the council and the decisions it makes. The council strives to serve all sides responsively. Its process is open, transparent and inclusive.

The council and its staff work long hours, weekends and holidays to responsibly manage ocean resources. The council consults federal legal advisers and operates under a carefully monitored budget with annual independent audits and the regular scrutiny of other federal agencies, including Congress and the Commerce Department.

Recently, a group of individuals have used the media in an attempt to prompt Congress and the inspector general to investigate the council. These same individuals have spoken at length at council meetings. We have answered their questions and provided them with documents. However, they will not be satisfied. They apparently prefer to cling to their agenda, morph their charges and ignore the facts.

Contrary to their allegations, the council and its staff did not sponsor, promote or lobby for any piece of state legislation, including House Bill 1848. The council and its staff do respond to inquiries from legislators and did organize a series of meetings with the Association of Hawaiian Civic Clubs and several state agencies to encourage the participation of indigenous communities in the fishery management process as mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other federal directives. These meetings were historic and immensely beneficial, yet some people apparently feel threatened by them.

These critics have a history of attempts to discredit the council, its members and staff. Their list of misinformation includes accusations that the council is under investigation. While there was a request for an investigation in 2005, the council responded to it and has been informed by its parent Commerce Department agency that there is no such investigation.

Failing to make a convincing case against the council, the critics have shifted their focus to a personal attack on the council's executive director, Kitty Simonds, claiming she's the nation's fifth-highest paid federal official. Research would show that her pay is fully consistent with the federal civil service pay scale, and there are many other federal employees in Hawaii who are paid as much or more. The executive director succeeded three predecessors in 1983 and has served since then under many chairmen (including me), four national administrations and four state administrations. To counteract these charges, this year on June 22 at the close of its 138th meeting, the council gave Simonds a unanimous vote of confidence.

Nevertheless, repetition of untruths can spread an impression of wrongdoing and waste. Unfortunately, some respected news media and other well-meaning organizations have mistaken these complainants as representatives of legitimate environmental concerns and have blindly accepted their allegations and insinuations, and regurgitated the misinformation without taking the time or effort for independent review before re-publication.

These complainants do not have the support they project through the use of titles of organizations to which they are affiliated. They are individuals with axes to grind. They do not represent the concerns of Hawaii's larger environmental or Hawaiian communities. Do the organizations have active and functioning governing bodies? Did the governing bodies of the respective organizations sanction their actions beforehand? Are the allegations made for personal interests and agendas, rather than conservation? "Who are these people and who do they really represent?" would be a good place to start.

Council work, by its very nature, is difficult and contentious. As required by the national standards contained in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, council work requires consideration of many competing interests and points of view before making decisions for the greater good of society. Council members do not have "constituencies"; it is not a matter of commercial fishing vs. recreational fishing vs. conservation, because ultimately we all have the same interest -- responsible management of the marine resources for food, cultural practices, recreation, aesthetics and enjoyment in perpetuity.

- Star-Bulletin, Honolulu

News: Shipping Company Fined $1 Million for Dumping

TACOMA, Wash. — A Greek shipping company has agreed to pay a $1 million fine after pleading guilty in U.S. District Court here to illegally dumping oily wastes into the ocean, the U.S. attorney's office says.

A portion of the fine to be paid by the company, Calypso Marine, will be used for environmental restoration projects in the Columbia River estuary and along the coasts of Oregon and Washington. The company entered its plea on Monday.

Coast Guard inspectors boarded the 35,000-ton bulk carrier Tina M when it was anchored in Kalama, a port on the Columbia River. The vessel's chief engineer, Jesus Sedigo Reyes, who directed the discharge activity by the ship's crew, pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the Coast Guard. He is scheduled to be sentenced July 6.

Crew members had been ordered to conduct discharge activities at night, to minimize the risk of detection.

Associated Press

<<<•>>>

Wednesday, July 4, 2007 - Holiday

<<<•>>>

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Teen Stops Murderous Attack on Alaska Tender

OAK FOREST, Ill. - Thrilled with the idea of making $125 a day, Oak Forest teen Brian O'Reilly signed on with an Alaskan fishing vessel this summer, hoping to earn enough for a sports car he has been eyeing back home.

But he never imagined he'd help thwart the attempted murder of his captain in the middle of the night, the 17-year-old told authorities.

"I wasn't processing anything through my mind at the time, just pretty much save myself and save the captain," said O'Reilly, who will be a senior at Sandburg High School this fall.

"I thought he was having a bad dream. And then I heard, 'I'm going to kill you.' I saw feet flying and blood splattered everywhere."

O'Reilly went to Valdez, Alaska, near the southern coast, about five weeks ago to stay with his aunt and uncle and work on Capt. Michael Blanchard's 92-foot tender, the New Saint Joseph. O'Reilly was a deckhand, and his job was to do whatever Blanchard said.

The three-man crew, which also included deckhand Justin Bullock, would set out to sea and collect salmon caught by small-boat fisherman. Then the ship would take the seafood to canneries, saving dozens of fishermen back-and-forth trips.

It was O'Reilly's fourth summer in Alaska, having spent the last three netting fish on smaller boats.

On his latest trip to Knowles Head in Prince William Sound, O'Reilly, Blanchard and Bullock had been out to sea for three days.

The nightmare began about 12:30 a.m., when O'Reilly said he heard his captain scream for help.

When O'Reilly scaled a ladder to the captain's quarters, he said he saw Bullock on top of Blanchard trying to choke him. Then the teenager said he saw Bullock stab the captain in the back.

"As I was pulling [Bullock] off, I pulled the knife out of [Blanchard's] back," O'Reilly said.

Bullock pulled out another knife and nicked the captain's neck, O'Reilly said. He and Blanchard wrestled with Bullock, eventually binding his hands and legs together.

They called the Coast Guard, then O'Reilly piloted the boat nearly nine hours back to shore.

"All this time, I'm watching the captain to make sure he stayed alive, and I'm watching [Bullock] to make sure he didn't do anything," O'Reilly said.

Bullock is in jail, indicted on one count of attempted murder and several counts of assault, said Michael Perry, assistant district attorney in Palmer, Alaska.

"It is very important to give [O'Reilly] his dues," said Valdez Police Lt. Leon Morgan. "It's quite impressive. Boy, he did a very good job."

O'Reilly plans to return to Oak Forest within the next few weeks, hoping to get a new summer job.

Chicago Sun-Times

Editorial: We Should Have Seen it Coming

No one in the seafood industry who has been paying attention was surprised by last week's FDA action issuing a country-wide import alert and detention for Chinese shrimp, basa, catfish, and some minor products.

The National Fisheries Institute and the Global Aquaculture Alliance, and several major importers who do business in China all said this move would strengthen the seafood industry, and that the testing and provision of healthful seafood products was critically important to the industry, and they praised the FDA's action.

Behind the scenes, however, its chaos. Several national retailers are reported to be scrambling to reduce the Chinese origin seafood products in their stores. One problem is that a huge percentage of private label products, such as breaded shrimp, are now products of China, and switching an entire private label line takes months.

Urner Barry's foreign trade data reports that in April and May, approximately 425 containers of Chinese shrimp entered the U.S. China supplies a significant and growing percentage of U.S. shrimp. Through April, NMFS data show China supplied 13.05% (21,141 metric tons) making China the third largest shrimp supplier behind Thailand (31.48%) and Ecuador (13.96%).

Current hold times on Chinese seafood products are often as long as 8 weeks at West Coast ports, and 4 weeks at East Coast ports. These are the average length of time it takes to get containers cleared and released by the FDA – whether they do sampling or not. Often the FDA will hold containers while they decide whether sampling is needed.

So far, according to the FDA, they have been sampling about 5% of all Chinese seafood imports. The change to a countrywide import alert is going to put huge financial and logistical pressure on the industry.

Many shipments from China now on the water will take much longer to get cleared, even with all the proper testing and documentation. And some industry concerns have been expressed about the storage space, ability of FDA and private laboratories to due timely sampling, and of course, the financial considerations that come into play when shipments are delayed and not cleared as expected.

Overall, the industry is looking at huge disruptions, which hopefully will be managed in a way not really felt by customers. But there are bound to be repercussions.

In some ways all parts of the industry- from processors who ship product to China, to importers who bring in both wild and farmed product, and to their customers which include all the major retail chains and the foodservice industry in the U.S. – are to blame for the increased costs, confusion, and economic pain that is going to result from these widespread detentions.

We as an industry have made our bed in China. And there are some fantastically clean and successful processing plants that have been built there. But in pursuit of lower costs, the move to China has always had a down side. Costs were lower, but so was transparency.

In many ways China remains a closed society, where the normal transparency that prevents many business abuses in the West is not in place. So for example, in the recent melamine scare, when the FDA sent inspectors to China they were unable to talk directly to the factory involved.

The concept was mentioned by an industry source: the idea that the lack of transparency in China could come back to haunt us.

For two years or more, many in the seafood industry have been screaming about the issue of economic integrity – also largely the result of cost cutting and rule breaking in China. How do you tell a processor who is willing to cheat on net weight, to label a product additive free and than add chemicals, or to mislabel a species altogether that that's okay, he just can't use illegal chemicals in aquaculture.

The fact is you can't. A business culture of lawbreaking doesn't pick and choose which laws to follow, and which to ignore. This type of culture ignores any law that hurts profits, or that gives a lawbreaker a competitive advantage.

Unfortunately, too many in the industry embraced this point of view, and took the position that if the customer wanted it, it was okay. So if the customer demanded $1.50 cod when the real market price was $2.95, we gave it to them. If the customer demanded cheaper shrimp, we gave it to them – by short weights, by soaking, and now it seems by some other methods as well.

In this sense the food safety crackdown on China could in fact be good for the entire U.S. seafood industry. It is a wake up call that shortcuts have their price, and that in producing a food product, there is a bottom line of safety, wholesomeness, and value that cannot be crossed. Too many in our industry knew they were crossing the line, but felt helpless to do anything about it.

Now the FDA has stepped in and done us all a favor.

As one importer who deals with China said, he is glad to see testing. He fully expects to see his companies get off the automatic detention list, he has tests in place in China as well as the U.S., and wants to give his customers guarantees that their products are contaminant free and wholesome. For him, the FDA halting the substandard shipments is a blessing, because it allows him to differentiate himself.

So it will be with other Chinese companies. Six months from now, there will be a list of Chinese companies, published by the FDA as exceptions to the countrywide alert, that are certified as being free from selling contaminated products, and who have procedures in place in China to prevent contamination from entering their supply chain.

But the cost of this is horrendous. Many consumers will simply stop buying fish from China. Many others will stop buying the types of fish mentioned—such as catfish—out of fear that something is wrong.

The companies who have private labels, and the distributors who have felt the need to push for the switch to Chinese seafood products may reevaluate the true cost of these actions.

In the end, this is country-wide detention is a blow for seafood integrity, and the industry is right to get behind it. Yet, at the same time, we should never have allowed things to get to this point.

- John Sackton, owner of seafood.com

Scientists Seek National Seafood Safety Program

SEATTLE – Confused about which kinds of fish are safe to eat, Americans are skipping seafood all together -- and missing out on health benefits, said federal scientists in Seattle. To unmuddy the water, they're calling for a nationwide program to investigate seafood contamination and educate the public.

"This needs to be done," said Usha Varanasi, science director of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, a part of the National Marine Fisheries Service. "This is dealing with people's health, people's food."

The national program would analyze seafood for dangerous chemicals and disease, and track their changes over time. It would evaluate the food's health benefits -- which can include protecting against heart and Alzheimer's disease, and helping fetal brain development -- and weigh that against risks posed by contamination.

The new program would translate that research into uniform, user-friendly information for consumers who are swamped by mixed messages about whether they should be eating chunk or whole tuna, sockeye salmon from Puget Sound or Chinook from Alaska.

"Every single fish is going to have a level of contamination," said Rob Duff, manager of the state Department of Ecology's Environmental Assessment Program. "You want to steer people to where the lowest levels of contamination are."

The three scientists calling for the new national program are from the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, and include Varanasi. Their recommendations were published in a column in the current issue of Fisheries -- a publication of the American Fisheries Society, "the oldest and largest professional society representing fisheries scientists."

The column came as state and federal agencies are raising numerous red flags over fish safety.

Last week the U.S. government banned the import of Chinese farm-raised shrimp, eel, two kinds of catfish, and dace, which is related to carp. Regulators testing the imported fish found antibiotics and potentially carcinogenic anti-fungal drugs that are banned here for use in farm-raised seafood.

Local fish don't get a clean bill of health, either. State officials recently warned people to limit their meals of common carp from Lake Washington. People already were cautioned against gorging on Northern pike minnow, yellow perch and cutthroat trout from Seattle's largest lake.

Last fall, health officials advised eating Puget Sound Chinook only once a week and resident Chinook, or blackmouth, twice a month because of troubling levels of mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.

Surveying the Safeway fish counter this week, Seattle resident Lauren Kingston wasn't too worried if the fish was from Canada or Indonesia, or whether officials were urging her to dine with caution.

"I don't eat that much seafood," she said. "It's stuff I don't really think about."

Kingston's preferred catch -- shrimp -- is considered a healthy choice by the state Department of Health, though imported shrimp gets dinged for being "harvested in environmentally harmful ways."

Shrimp are one of the reasons Varanasi wrote the column. Her agency was asked to test the tasty crustaceans for contamination after Hurricane Katrina trashed the Gulf Coast.

But there wasn't any baseline information to tell the scientists how polluted the shrimp were before the disaster. Without that, how could officials responsibly recommend one seafood over another, or tell people to avoid it altogether? A national program of testing pollution in mud and bottom-dwelling fish was canceled after 10 years in 1994.

Locally, the state's Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program is credited with doing a pretty good job tracking pollution in the marine ecosystem.

"Monitoring programs are very tedious and expensive," Varanasi said. That doesn't mean they're unimportant. "We need to take the pulse."

Duff promotes regular testing of fish to watch for new risks -- including chemical flame retardants and pharmaceuticals.

And because these and other chemicals can damage the brain during development and disrupt hormone function, Duff urges people to focus on those at greatest risk: women who are pregnant or of child-bearing age and young children.

Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Fishermen's Group Buys Lobster for Release into the Wild

PICTOU, Nova Scotia - Some lucky lobsters trapped on the last day of fishing season will live to swim again.

Kay Wallace, director of the Gulf Nova Scotia Bonafide Fisherman's Association, said the organization will buy more than $240,000 worth of lobster from fishermen from Pictou to Aulds Cove on Saturday and will release them back into fishing grounds.

"The effort behind this is we want to maintain a sustainable fishery," said Wallace.

"Science predicts 80 percent of those lobster will spawn again and molt."

In areas where fishermen's individual lobster landings were more than 10,000 pounds, the association is willing to collect 200 pounds from each fisherman, one male for every five females of comparable size.

In areas where individual landings were below that amount, they will purchase up to 400 pounds from each fisherman.

"We're paying shore price," she said. Currently that amount is $6.75 per pound.

Two fishermen at each wharf have been appointed project leaders and will issue payment when the lobsters are received.

At the end of the day, project leaders will sail out to their respective fishing grounds and dump their load back into the Northumberland Strait.

The organization is using its snow crab fishery allocation to fund the program.

Wallace said at the majority of wharves from northern Nova Scotia to Cape Breton, lobster landings were down this year compared to 2006 totals.

"It's been a poor season for weather and the lobster just don't move on days where there is an easterly wind," said the director.

Fishermen experienced easterly winds on 35 days during the two-month long season.

– Boston Globe

Coasties Search for Missing Bristol Bay Fisherman

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – A Coast Guard HH-60 Jayhawk helicopter and crew from Air Station Kodiak were searching for a crewman reported missing from the fishing vessel Nezzen early Tuesday morning on the Ugashik River in Bristol Bay.

The man was discovered missing just before 1 a.m. Tuesday. The master of the vessel immediately notified the Pilot Point Village Safety Officer, who contacted the Dillingham Police Department.

Notification from the Dillingham Police reached the Coast Guard Command Center in Juneau about 25 minutes after the fishing vessel's initial call to the village safety officer.

The Coast Guard immediately issued an Urgent Marine Information Broadcast (UMIB) to notify mariners in the area to keep a sharp lookout for any sign of the man. They then launched a Jayhawk helicopter and crew from Kodiak to conduct a shoreline search, and the vessel Nezzen continued its own search for the crewman. The tide was incoming with a speed of 3.5 knots. No signs of the man were found overnight.

Searchers are continuing to look for the man Tuesday. The original helicopter and crew were relieved by a fresh crew and they were searching the harbor, mouth of Ugashik Bay and conducting another shoreline search.

Weather conditions in the area were reported as overcast with fog. Visibility was limited to one-quarter of a mile. The winds were from the south at about 5 knots. The weather was not forecast to improve.

Communications in the area continued to be challenge searchers.

The fishing vessel Nezzen is a 32-foot vessel homeported in Port Charlotte, Fla. The vessel has operated in Bristol Bay since 2001.

Ugashik Bay is a 25-mile-long estuary and rich salmon fishery, part of the larger Bristol Bay area, which accounts for over two-thirds of the world's entire sockeye (red) salmon production. The bay is eight miles wide and twenty-one miles long forming an askew "comma" shape.

The Ugashik District is the southern-most of the seven Bristol Bay salmon-management districts of Southwest Alaska and is located on the Alaska Peninsula about 100-miles south of the regional hub of King Salmon. The entire area lies some 400 miles southwest of Anchorage.

Coast Guard press release

<<<•>>>

Friday, July 6, 2007

Letter to Editor: Fish More Important than Pebble Mine

ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Regarding the article "Mine protest planned for Dillingham" (June 9): I do not hold a Bristol Bay fishing permit, but I do hold a Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission fishing and subsistence permit. I applaud the people of Dillingham for standing up for their rights to protest the Pebble mine project. I, too, feel it will affect the price of fish in our region, i.e. the wild Alaska salmon image.

The fishing industry has been the backbone of Alaska for generations and will continue to be so. I think Pebble promoters fail to see the picture in whole, that fishing is a valuable renewable resource that we Alaskans depend on for commercial and subsistence purposes. The $200 billion that could be gained by the project is a drop in the bucket compared to what Bristol Bay fishery has done in the past and will continue to do in the future for Alaska.

I agree with Bob Waldrop, economic development economist, who I think sees the real picture that the land should not be developed. These large companies that have lots of money to throw around for their gain will not hesitate to walk right over you if they can.

- Morris Nakarak, writing to the Anchorage Daily News

News: Worry Over Sea Lice Stirs Fish Farmers

A Norwegian wrasse (cleaner fish) breeding specialist is visiting the NAFC Marine Centre in Scalloway, Shetland this week as part of a project to find a "