pf home
Summary for November 19 - November 23, 2007:

Monday, November 19. 2007

Bay Area Crabbers Seek to Expand Closed Area

SAN FRANCISCO - Bay Area seafood lovers hoping to put local Dungeness on the Thanksgiving table might be out of luck, and commercial crabbers are hoping to keep it that way.

 Lawyers for the crab boat owners associations in San Francisco, Half Moon Bay and Bodega Bay were exploring legal options on Friday to block an executive order by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that closed only a narrow band of ocean waters to crabbing and fishing in the wake of last week's Cosco Busan fuel spill.

 San Francisco attorney Michael Duncheon said the commercial crabbers want a ban on all crabbing and fishing below Point Arena in Mendocino County, including the entire Gulf of the Farallones, most of which remains open to the harvesting of Dungeness. His law firm, Hanson Bridgett, is representing the associations.

 "We would like the governor and Department of Fish and Game to change their minds and expand the closure," Duncheon said. "The crab fishing water the commercial boats normally fish in should have been closed, because it potentially was affected by the spill."

 The injunction, if there is one, would seek to close fishing and crabbing by both commercial and recreational anglers.

 Sam Delson, a spokesman for the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, a division of the state Environmental Protection Agency, said testing for the health of Dungeness and other marine life in local waters already is under way, with sampling completed Friday.

 The crab were taken from varying depths off Stinson Beach, Bodega Bay and the coastline between San Francisco and San Mateo counties, Delson said.

 Results of the toxicology tests should be available by Nov. 28.

 For now, hundreds of Bay Area crabbers, whose season opened Thursday, are refusing to set gear, believing the current closure is insufficient to guarantee the health of their catch.

 "Anybody that has crabbing gear out there, we want them to bring it in," said Larry Collins, president of the San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association. "Once the crab have been tested, and if they test OK, we want a nice orderly opener."

 Recreational anglers and some party boats from San Francisco Bay marinas, along with Half Moon Bay and Bodega Bay, have continued to take Dungeness since the sport season opened Nov. 3.

 With no local commercial crab coming in, Bay Area wholesalers, processors and seafood buyers are scrambling to meet demand for the signature crustacean of the holidays.

 Mike Lucas, president of North Coast Fisheries, a large seafood wholesaler and processor in Santa Rosa with distribution over the entire Bay Area, said he has no live Dungeness available.

 Lucas, like other wholesale seafood purchasers in the Bay Area, is looking north to Washington for Dungeness crab, where there is a limited commercial season open to American Indian tribes working the waters between Anacortes and Blaine.

 On Thursday, at least six buyers from the Bay Area were said to have shown up there to haggle for crab. Mike Manning, owner of Blaine Crab, which purchases directly from boats at both ports, said only one buyer went home with Dungeness.

 Lucas said some 3.5 million pounds of live Dungeness typically move through the Bay Area seafood markets in November, with most of it sold Thanksgiving week.

 One wholesale buyer and retail outlet that did have live Dungeness from Washington on Friday was the Alioto-Lazio Fish Co. at the west end of Fisherman's Wharf.

 Angel Cincotta, one of the owners, said that out of a shipment Thursday she had maybe 100 crab available after taking orders all week.

 Cincotta didn't know when another shipment of Washington crab would come in, but both hoped it would be early next week. – San Francisco Chronicle

NOAA, USDA Want Ideas on Non Fish Based Aquaculture Feed

WASHINGTON, D.C. - NOAA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture are soliciting information and ideas on ways to lessen dependence on fish-based feeds in the aquaculture industry. This comment period is the first step of a broad, year-long program that will include research projects, scientific consultations and a national workshop aimed at developing new and effective ingredients for aqua-feed.

 "Forty percent of the seafood consumed in the United States comes from farmed sources, so we have a keen interest in making sure that aquaculture production is efficient and environmentally responsible," said Bill Hogarth, director of NOAA Fisheries Service. "Our program will identify science needs on alternative feeds for aquaculture to guide federal research funding priorities."

 Congress is considering legislation to allow NOAA to permit aquaculture operations in federal waters, three to 200 miles off U.S. coasts. If enacted, the National Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2007 also would authorize a research and development program for all marine aquaculture, which would advance the movement to find additional feed options.

 Producers feed pellets to farm-raised fish and shrimp that are made in part from ground-up herring, menhaden, anchovy, and sardines, so-called industrial fish. These small, bony species provide farmed seafood with important protein, fatty acids and essential vitamins and minerals.

 The issue of feed ingredients is a challenge facing the expanding global aquaculture industry because industrial fish are under increasing pressure as a commercial fishery worldwide. The cost of fish meal has risen steeply as farming operations have increased. In 2002, 46 percent of fishmeal went to aquaculture uses, while 22 percent went to poultry and 24 percent went to pigs. The amount of available fish meal and fish oil is not likely to increase, so producers must find other sources of feed protein as the aquaculture industry continues to grow.

 In response, industry is turning to other feed ingredients such as algae and soybeans, thus reducing the use of fishmeal and fish oil. Studies are helping scientists to better understand the nutritional requirements of fish to ensure new feeds effectively grow seafood that retains nutritional benefits for humans. NOAA Fisheries Service and USDA's Agricultural Research Service and Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service are interested in making better use of discarded fish parts from fish processing plants for feeds, in addition to using a variety of potential ingredients from agriculture, including plants.

 To submit a question, idea, or recommendation on alternative feeds for aquaculture, stakeholders should send an e-mail to: noaa.aquaculture@noaa.gov; send a fax to: 301-713-9108; or, send a letter to: NOAA Aquaculture Program, Alternative Feeds Initiative, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13117, Silver Spring, MD 20910. The deadline for comments is Feb. 29, 2008. –HT Media Ltd.

Oil Spill Cleanup Delays Showed Flaws in System

SACRAMENTO, Calif., California has long been recognized for maintaining one of the world's toughest oil spill prevention and response systems. But last week's spill into San Francisco Bay revealed a number of flaws that may have turned a modest incident into a disaster.

 The 910-foot container ship Cosco Busan struck a Bay Bridge tower at about 8:27 a.m. Nov. 7. The impact tore open the ship's hull and two fuel tanks, spilling an estimated 58,000 gallons of heavy fuel oil into the bay.

 A week later the true consequences of that moderate spill are still emerging.

 As of Thursday, more than 20 Bay Area beaches remained closed, more than 830 birds had died and crab fishing was halted between San Mateo and Point Reyes. On Thursday, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger ordered a full state investigation.

 Experts say the 120 minutes after any oil spill are the most critical. A week later, many involved agreed the first two hours after this incident were misspent.

 "It's really clear there was just a fundamental failure of what was supposed to be a world-renowned response system," said Linda Sheehan, executive director of the California Coastkeeper Alliance, who also sits on a committee that advises the state Office of Spill Prevention and Response.

 A key rupture in the response was that local cleanup crews under contract to the Cosco Busan were not notified about the incident until 50 minutes after the impact, at about 9:17 a.m., according to various accounts.

 It took 33 minutes more for the first cleanup boat to reach the scene, said Peter Benz, president of the primary cleanup contractor, Marine Spill Response Corp. That boat carried only two people and no cleanup boom to corral oil, Benz said.

 Within two hours of the first alarm, four more MSRC vessels arrived with 3,700 feet of boom. But that was insufficient; the spill was bigger than first reported. The initial report to MSRC put the spill at 420 gallons. It wasn't until 1 p.m. that MSRC learned that the spill was much bigger.

 By then there were eight vessels on the water and about a mile-and-a-half of boom. But they were trying to corral a moving target: The Cosco Busan moved twice, trailing oil with it. The tide had turned, ebbing out of the bay at more than 2 knots, spreading oil far and wide.

 California's oil-spill response system, like its federal counterpart, was adopted in 1990 in the wake of the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, which was 200 times bigger than last week's incident.

 The state requires shipping companies and cleanup contractors to submit to unannounced drills and inspections to prove their response capabilities. The state Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) was created to conduct these inspections and police the industry, using a fee charged on each barrel of oil sold in the state.

 The federal system relies on the honor system, allowing the industry to prove readiness by submitting its own drill records to the Coast Guard, which doesn't conduct surprise drills.

 But both systems give industry a major hand in their own regulation, an approach now being questioned.

 The Marine Spill Response Corp. is beholden to a non-profit operated by the oil industry. Its regional vice president also heads the technical committee that advises the state OSPR, where the oil industry has another seat, now held by a representative of British Petroleum.

 Oil industry representatives and the owners of the ship did not respond to calls for comment. But MSRC's Benz said the response system is adequate and that the industry must have a role in its operation.

 At the federal level, when Congress passed the Oil Pollution Act in 1990, it also gave the oil industry a strong role in cleanup and remediation planning. - Seattle Post Intelligencer

Letter to Editor: Put More Fishermen on Crab Committee

KODIAK, Alaska - Not having gone to the last North Pacific Fishery Management Council meeting, it’s taken time to find out what happened.

 Briefly, as I have it now, our man Duncan Fields submitted a valid motion to “consider crew.” It was debated at some length. It was tabled. Duncan could have brought it back up but abandoned it. The result is the invalid motion that finally passed.

 It’s common knowledge that new deals are made every coffee break at the NPFMC. Why did Duncan suddenly quit the fight? Why, when his own motion was introduced later by the member from Washington state, didn’t he attempt to rally the so-called Alaskan members to get it passed?

 Much was made of the fact that Duncan put two fishermen on the Crab Advisory Committee that works for the NPFMC and will decide the crewmen’s fate when the time comes.

 But Duncan had to know from the outset that two could never carry a vote on that committee. Three would have had a chance, but two is a sure loser and just a fig leaf for him, coming home as he was without the bacon. At the very least, he should see that the third fisherman is added in December.

 Duncan is the guy to see if you want some community development quota (CDQs) for your town. These CDQs are a portion cut out of the fishermen’s individual fishing quota for communities. They presently take 10 percent of the IFQs in the Bering Sea. There are persistent rumors that in the considerations of the NPFMC over the next year, this percentage could be raised by 50 percent.

 And this bit of news: The NPFMC, our imperial council, has decided that they can’t decide this whole thing by the target date of early ’08. They’ve pushed it forward to October ’08. I don’t think they feel they can pull off this slight of hand in the present climate (chilly) and intend to do most of their work in the summer when everybody’s fishing. –John Finley to Kodiak Daily Mirror

Three Nominated for NPFMC Seat

JUNEAU, Alaska - Gov. Sarah Palin nominated Alaska fisheries veterans Ed Dersham, Mike Heimbuch and Roland Maw as candidates to fill the North Pacific Fishery Management Council seat vacated by Ed Rasmuson.

 Dersham, a longtime charter boat operator in Lower Cook Inlet, served on the Alaska Board of Fisheries for more than eight years, including three years as chair and two years as vice-chair. He holds a bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Oregon and is a retired from a career as a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Agency. Dersham is Palin's recommendation for appointment.

 Heimbuch, a commercial fisherman from Homer, has fished for halibut, herring, cod, shrimp and salmon around the state since 1963. He has served on a variety of civic and local government commissions, including the fish and game advisory committee and the Prince William Sound Aquaculture Association. He is an active political writer in Alaska newspapers and is currently a member of the Homer City Council. He majored in music and education at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

 Maw, a Kasilof resident, is executive director of United Cook Inlet Drift Association and is co-owner of a charter and salmon research business based in Homer. He has served on the United Fishermen of Alaska's board of directors, on the Kenai Peninsula Fish and Game Advisory Committee and on the Joint Legislative Salmon Task Force Governance Committee. Maw has a doctoral degree in forestry and wildlife management from the University of Alberta.

 The North Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional councils established by the 1976 Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, later renamed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, to oversee management of the nation's marine fisheries. The council has jurisdiction of more than 900,000 square miles of ocean from 3 to 200 miles off Alaska's shores, and the primary responsibility for managing Pollock, cod, halibut, sole and other groundfish.

 The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires governors of specific coastal states to provide a minimum of three candidates for each applicable vacancy, from which the secretary of commerce makes the final selection. – Alaska Journal of Commerce

 <<<•>>>

Tuesday, November 20. 2007

Washington crab opener in doubt

WESTPORT, Wash. -- A debate over prices, combined with balancing tribal and non-tribal quotas could delay the season for crab fishermen, even though state officials say crabs from Westport and Long Beach will be ready for harvesting Dec. 1.

 Uncertainty over the season is in stark contrast to Oregon's crab fishery. Oregon crab fishermen and processors have already agreed on an opening price of $2 per pound, about 35 cents more than last year. Fisherman will be able to drop pots on Dec. 1.

 Washington fishermen say Oregon's early season and price-setting makes things difficult for them at the negotiating table.

 "We basically have no input on the price any more, because we don't go when the rest of the coast does," said Ray Toste, president of the Washington Dungeness Crab Fisherman's Association.

 Toste said the bulk of the Washington coast won't open until after Christmas and they will be forced to take the Oregon price -- even though $2 a pound is a "slap in the face."

 He said crab fishermen have no choice because they are so far behind. The 2005-06 season didn't start until late December and mid-January.

 "We realized the impact (of starting later) last year as we listened in on our marketing association meetings. We were part of the process, but only as listeners. There was nothing we could say," Toste said.

 He said the market should be able to accept a higher price after an oil spill ruined the San Francisco season. – Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Oregon fishermen, crab buyers make nice

FLORENCE - After two years of rocky relationships, the fishermen who catch Oregon Dungeness crab and the processors who sell it to supermarkets made nice and agreed on an opening price for the state's most valuable fishery.

Crabbers will earn $2 per pound, 35 cents more than the price at last year's stalled opener. The season will begin Dec. 1, which is good news for the skippers, the buyers and the crustacean-craving public.

The reason that's a good thing for everyone is that it means plenty of crabs in the marketplace by Christmas and New Year's, when demand is at its highest level of the year - especially for live Dungeness.

People buy more live crab during the holidays, as opposed to the sections they're more likely to buy at other times of the year. Live crab also fetches a higher price, a boon to processors.

The reason fishermen are happy about the on-time start to this year's season is it will make for safer fishing trips.

When the season starts late as it has the past two years there's more pressure on the fleet to catch as many crabs as possible as rapidly as possible. So they're more likely to brave marginal, dangerous weather conditions in order to come back with a full haul.

Starting on time means there'll be a "pre-soak," a 64-hour period where skippers can drop the steel cages called "pots" tied to buoys in the ocean, but they can't retrieve them. That makes for an orderly start to the season.

 The pre-soak also levels the playing field. Some of the larger crab boats can haul twice or three times as many pots as small vessels. During the pre-soak, small boats can make multiple trips to set all their pots, which helps them stay competitive with the bigger ships.

Al Pazar, chairman of the Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission, credit state-sanctioned negotiations for the smooth road to an agreed-upon price this year. This is the fifth season processors and crabbers have bargained with mediators from the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife at the table, instead of trying to work out individual arrangements between boats and processors. Such a meeting would violate federal anti-trust laws if the state didn't sit in.

The first two years of state-sanctioned talks went smoothly, but the past two have resulted in delays. In 2005, the two sides had trouble agreeing on a price. Last year, processors asked for more testing to ensure the crabs were ready to harvest.

This year, the bargaining was smooth, Pazar said.

"These state-sanctioned price negotiations are one of the most valuable tools we have in our bag," he said.

An oil spill in the San Francisco Bay area has delayed the start of the crab season there, but Pazar said he did not expect that to have much of an impact.

Hugh Link, the crab commission's interim administrator said Thursday that the fleet brought in 15.2 million pounds of crab last year, at an average price of $2.17 per pound. That puts the total haul at $32 million.

Whether the crabbers will bring in that much this year is anyone's guess, said Rod Moore, executive director of the West Coast Seafood Processor's Association.

"We'll have to see what the weather does," Moore said. – Register-Guard, Eugene

Boat builder Nichols Bros. files for bankruptcy

FREELAND, Wash. – Nichols Brothers Boat Builders Inc., the Whidbey Island maker of tugboats and ferries, has filed for bankruptcy protection from creditors, while still working on plans to rehire the 180 workers it laid off earlier this month.

 Nichols Brothers listed debts of $43.9 million and assets of $3.41 million in a Friday reorganization petition in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Seattle. It said its largest creditor is Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC, which holds a $20 million claim. It sued Nichols Brothers last year over a contract dispute.

 Closely held Nichols Brothers, based in Freeland, had revenue of $6.86 million in 2007, compared with $23.6 million in 2006 and $35.7 million in 2005, company President Bryan Nichols said in court papers.

 Nichols Brothers was building two 100-foot tugboats and a 116-foot catamaran passenger ferry for the San Francisco Water Transit Authority at the time of the filing, according to its Web site.

The company is working on plans to rehire its workers Nov. 30, Nichols said Monday in a phone interview. It has a second facility in Langley.

 Hornbeck sued Nichols Brothers in June 2006, accusing the company of failing to provide a $12.5 million letter of credit it demanded as security until four vessels were delivered.

 Covington, La.-based Hornbeck, an operator of watercraft for the energy industry, claims the failure of the contract led to increased construction costs and lost profits while it waited for the ships to be built.

 Nichols said it's in talks with Hornbeck to resolve the dispute.

 "We are reorganizing in a way that the Hornbeck suit won't be a problem," Nichols said. "But we are not actively negotiating a deal with Hornbeck for any ownership in the company."

 Nichols Brothers was sued in March over a $12.3 million contract for a luxury yacht designed to hold 750 people and house a traveling fine-art exposition. The customer, Bonita Springs, Fla.-based Expoships, says the 228-foot "Grand Luxe" had water damage when it was delivered six months late.

 The suit, filed in Seattle federal court, also accused Nichols Brothers of "using funds received from Expoships to complete work on other projects," including a garbage barge and a municipal ferry project that used much of its work force. The case has been settled.

 "That was a neat project, but we both cut our losses and walked away from the suit," Nichols said. "We lost money on it and were unable to raise additional funds."

 Nichols holds a 14.5 percent share of the company. His brother, Matthew, the company's chief executive, has a 65 percent share.

 The case is In re Nichols Brothers Boat Builders Inc., 07- 15522, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Washington. – Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Feds recommend keeping Klamath dams

GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- Federal licensing authorities recommended keeping PacifiCorp's four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, siding with the utility and ignoring calls from fisheries agencies to build fish ladders.

The final environmental impact statement from the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chose trapping and hauling fish around the dams rather than building expensive fish ladders and reducing power production to help salmon.

The statement described that as the best economic choice while allowing for evaluation of restoring fish to the upper Klamath Basin for the first time in a century.

FERC spokeswoman Celeste Miller acknowledged that fish ladders and other improvements required by NOAA Fisheries and other federal agencies are "generally" included in the final license, leading salmon advocates to dismiss the latest evaluation as "legally infeasible."

Meanwhile, Indian tribes hoping to restore salmon runs that once were crucial to their cultures, Klamath Basin farmers who depend on cheap power and water for irrigation, and California commercial salmon fishermen suffering dramatic cutbacks in fishing seasons from declining Klamath River salmon runs, met in Redding, Calif. They are seeking a deal to remove the dams with state and federal help.

Participants said they were near an agreement that will be taken to PacifiCorp. The utility has said it would be willing to remove the dams if it doesn't hurt its customers. It also is willing to spend $300 million on fish ladders and other required improvements to keep the dams that produce power without greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.

Based in Portland, PacifiCorp is owned by MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., based in Des Moines, Iowa, and controlled by billionaire Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The utility serves 1.6 million customers in six western states.

It is seeking a new license to operate the four dams straddling the Oregon-California border on the Klamath River for the next 30 to 50 years. The dams produce enough power for 70,000 households.

When removing all four dams was evaluated against building the fish ladders and other measures required by NOAA Fisheries and other federal agencies, removing the dams came out $7 million a year cheaper -- a net power production loss of $13.2 million a year compared to $20.2 million.

Keeping the dams and trapping and hauling fish, along with conditions recommended by FERC, would produce $2 million a year in net power benefits. PacifiCorp's proposal for operating the dams, which carries the least improvements for fish, would produce net annual power benefits of $17 million.

Salmon advocates noted that removing all four dams produces the best improvements in water quality and salmon restoration, reducing obstacles that block 300 miles of spawning streams, draining reservoirs that breed toxic algae that pollute the Klamath River and eliminating conditions that promote fish diseases.

"The bottom line is they're saying removal is the best and cheapest alternative," said Glen Spain of Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California commercial salmon fishermen's group. The FERC recommendation "is not legally feasible" without taking into account the fish ladders.

Craig Tucker, Klamath campaign director for the Karuk Tribe, added: "FERC staff is pandering to PacifiCorp's bottom line, where it is cheaper for everybody and avoids an environmental catastrophe and the destruction of tribal cultures to simply remove the dams."

"It's a schizophrenic document," said Jim McCarthy of Oregon Wild, a Portland conservation group. "It's sort of FERC sticking its head in the sand hoping somehow these mandatory conditions disappear. They will not."

PacifiCorp spokeswoman Jan Mitchell said the company had not yet seen the document. – Los Angeles Times

Suit filed in San Francisco oil spill

SAN FRANCISCO -- Audet & Partners, LLP, a San Francisco-based, nationally recognized law firm that focuses on class actions and complex litigation, announced today that it has filed a class action complaint in federal court on behalf of commercial fishing operators who suffered economic injury as a result of the Cosco Bay Area Oil Spill of November 7. The plaintiff, Chelsea, LLC, is a family-owned commercial crab operation. The class damages are estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

"Our case is simple and straightforward: the defendants' negligence caused commercial fishermen and related operators to lose millions and millions of dollars during this critical fishing season," said William M. Audet of Audet & Partners, LLP.

 According to Audet, "The reports over the past few days clearly establish at least negligence on the part of the defendants." Named in the lawsuit are Regal Stone, Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping, Co., Ltd.

 Additional information about the case and Audet & Partners can be found at http://www.audetlaw.com. The complaint is entitled Chelsea, LLC, on behalf of the Class v. Regal Stone, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 07-5800 (Northern District of California. –Press release

 <<<•>>>

Wednesday, November 21, 2007 

Market continues to boom for pollock

LONDON – With cod stocks under threat from over-fishing, British shoppers are turning to a cheap and abundant alternative that has won the backing of leading chefs.

Sales of pollock have surged by 44 per cent in the past six months on the back of celebrity support and the increase is gaining pace, according to figures from the industry body, Seafish. Although still only one-tenth those of cod, pollock sales almost trebled in the four weeks to Oct. 6.

The chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall extolled the virtues of battered pollock and chips on the Channel 4 show River Cottage's Gone Fishing last night, while the former Masterchef winner Thomasina Miers made a pollock stew on the BBC's Saturday Kitchen. Gordon Ramsay has also publicised recipes using the fish.

Major supermarkets are beginning to stock pollock, with much of the supply certified sustainable by the Marine Stewardship Council. From this month, the fast-food chain McDonald's is making its fish burgers out of pollock rather than New Zealand hoki.

Pollock has two different species, the Alaskan or Pacific pollock and the species found off the West Country coast. Up to 99 per cent of pollock sold in Britain now comes from Alaskan and Pacific fisheries but the British type is becoming popular too, thanks to public support for the Cornish fishing industry.

One day, sustainable fishing experts hope the new-found popularity of pollock and other species such as megrim, gurnard and dab will take pressure off struggling species such as haddock, skate and cod. – The Independent

Huge crab catch reported off San Francisco Bay

SAN FRANCISCO – Nearly 100,000 pounds of live Dungeness crab apparently caught by Oregon fishermen near the Farallones are headed to Bay Area seafood wholesalers for distribution to consumers -- a major blow to local commercial fishermen.

 Hundreds of fishermen in San Francisco, Bodega Bay and Half Moon Bay have been desperately trying to keep untested crab off local dinner plates in the wake of the Cosco Busan fuel spill in San Francisco Bay. They have vowed not to harvest crab until the state, which has been testing specimens caught locally, confirms the crabs are not contaminated. Results are due Nov. 28.

 Most Bay Area seafood wholesalers and distributors had agreed not to purchase locally caught Dungeness. The consensus was that one sick consumer could ruin the entire crab season, which began Thursday.

 But at about 12:10 a.m. Tuesday, two Oregon fishing boats that had been seen setting their crab gear outside the Golden Gate docked at a Monterey commercial pier. There, working under cover of darkness and well into the morning, workers from a seafood wholesaler, Royal Seafood, offloaded nearly 100,000 pounds of Dungeness from the holding tanks of the vessels Fierce Contender and Chevelle.

 The crabs were loaded onto waiting refrigerated trucks, which the wholesaler said were headed to San Francisco.

 "The whole thing is totally disheartening," said Larry Collins, president of the San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association. "We're trying to do the right thing here. We need to know the crab are safe before they get to the buyers and consumers."

 The local fishermen had been so determined not to allow any local crab to enter the market that members of one crabbers' association confronted a fisherman who brought a small load of crab to a Bodega Bay dock.

 Fisherman Tony Annelo, an association member, paid the fisherman nearly $1,000 for the catch, which he then freed, in exchange for the boat owner's vow that he refrain from fishing until further notice.

 It was unclear Tuesday whether anyone was purchasing the crab that was unloaded in Monterey, but many buyers said they weren't buying.

 Joe Pennisi, who owns Royal Seafood in Monterey and struck a deal with the owners of the out-of-state boats to offload their catch, said much of the crab was going to be offered to buyers at Pier 45 in San Francisco.

 But several seafood buyers at Pier 45 said they turned down an offer to purchase the crab.

"We were approached about cooking some of the crab for a wholesaler here," said Ron Pezzolo, a seafood buyer and processor at Pier 45. "We declined. There was absolutely no way we were touching that crab."

 Pezzolo said he has continued to bring in what Dungeness he can from a limited commercial fishery in Washington.

 "It would be the easiest thing for us to buy that crab (from Monterey)," Pezzolo said. "But there's a bigger issue here than making a dollar."

 At Caito Fisheries, one of the largest wholesalers at Fisherman's Wharf, no live Dungeness are available. Jeanette Caito, who works at the business owned by her brother John Caito, said she has no intention of bringing in any crab caught from the Gulf of the Farallones until toxicology test results come back clean.

 "We want nothing to do with it until there's clearance," she said.

 Caito Fisheries typically sells upwards of 750,000 pounds of Dungeness between the commercial opener and Thanksgiving, Jeanette Caito said. "This year, none," she said.

During the offloading in Monterey, at least seven trucks - some of them 18-wheelers - waiting at the dock to be loaded with crab.

 Many of the trucks, Pennisi said, were headed for seafood processors and wholesalers in San Francisco, "to the same people we usually buy from."

 One of the trucks waiting for crab was registered to seafood wholesaler Ken Sio Inc. in Oakland. The business could not be reached for comment.

 Its neighbor, NorCal Seafood, has been distributing crab from Washington, said owner Kevin Lee.

 "We don't have crab from here yet," Lee said Tuesday.

 The Oregon boats were unable to deliver their catch directly to potential buyers in San Francisco, as the bay is within the area closed by the state. Boats with live-well holding tanks are not allowed to pump in water -- to keep their catch alive -- within the closed areas.

 The Oregon boats could have unloaded their catch in either Bodega Bay or Half Moon Bay instead of Monterey, but it was made clear last week by some of the largest local seafood wholesalers that they were not interested in untested crab from the gulf -- and there probably wouldn't be any crew willing to offload the catch.

 Buyers such as Mike Lucas, president of North Coast Fisheries, a large seafood wholesaler in Santa Rosa with dock space in Bodega Bay, have stated that they are not interested in untested crab from the Gulf of the Farallones.

 "We're looking elsewhere for now," Lucas said last week.

 A call to Dennis Sturgell, owner of the Fierce Contender, was not returned.

Pennisi said the boats just happened to arrive in the middle of the night. He said the two boats were carrying a total of nearly 100,000 pounds of live Dungeness.

 "These are big boats ... and they had to offload," Pennisi said.

 Collins, whose own boat, the Autumn Gale, remains idle at Fisherman's Wharf, said he has been aware of the two out-of-state boats fishing the crabbing grounds outside the Golden Gate since the season opened last Thursday.

 "We knew they were out there," Collins said. "And we knew they would eventually find a place to offload. Unfortunately, there are always going to be guys that just don't care."

 Thus far, at least two lawsuits have been filed in connection with the 58,000-gallon fuel spill's effect on crab fishing. Last week, San Francisco lawyer William Audet filed a class-action suit in federal court on behalf of crab fishermen, seeking at least $100 million in damages for loss of income.

 In San Francisco Superior Court, Bay Area fishermen John Tarantino and Steven Fitz filed suit, asking that the owners and operators of the ship pay for the losses they are incurring and for a fund to monitor marine life in the bay and nearby ocean.

 Last Wednesday, the Department of Fish and Game outlined the area of closure, amounting to a 3-mile-wide band of ocean between Pedro Point in San Mateo County and Marin's Point Reyes, along with all San Francisco Bay waters west of the Carquinez Bridge.

 That left open to crabbing nearly all the traditional Dungeness ground outside the Golden Gate, where the large Oregon boats are believed to have set and hauled their crab gear.

The suit on behalf of the fishermen was filed Tuesday by Burlingame law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, specialists in class actions. – San Francisco Chronicle

Love for king crab results in jail time

An apparent taste for seafood landed a Watertown (N.Y.) man in jail Sunday.

Dominic A. Rima, 27, of 528 LeRay Street was charged with robbery 3rd degree when he was arrested at the P & C supermarket in Stateway Plaza. He was also charged with Issuing a Bad Check for an incident at 402 Mill Street on Sept. 12.

 According to WPD, Rima allegedly tried to steal $108.23 worth of Alaskan king crab legs. When he attempted to leave the store, Rima hit and struggled with a security guard.

Rima was held for arraignment this morning in Watertown City Court. – Newswatch 50, NY

Processor fined $6.9 million for illegal immigrants

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Owners of a Newport News fishing company pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to employing illegal immigrants on its scallop boats.

Under a plea deal, Peabody Corp. and its owner its owner, William Francis Peabody and his daughter, Yvonne Michelle Peabody, have agreed to pay $6.9 million in forfeitures and fines. William Peabody faces up to six months in prison while Yvonne Peabody could get up to 12 months in prison.

U.S. District Court Judge Raymond Jackson must decide whether to accept the plea agreement, and determine the sentence. A hearing has been set for March 6.

Peabody, which operates eight vessels out of a city-owned dock at the end of Jefferson Avenue, hired the illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico, on scallop boats that go to sea for up to two weeks at a time, according to the federal document. The company did so "knowing said aliens were unauthorized," and it attempted to "shield from detection said aliens for the purpose of commercial advantage and private gain," according to the charges, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court. – Newport News, Va., Daily Press

Processor fined $6.9 million for illegal immigrants

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Owners of a Newport News fishing company pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to employing illegal immigrants on its scallop boats.

Under a plea deal, Peabody Corp. and its owner its owner, William Francis Peabody and his daughter, Yvonne Michelle Peabody, have agreed to pay $6.9 million in forfeitures and fines. William Peabody faces up to six months in prison while Yvonne Peabody could get up to 12 months in prison.

U.S. District Court Judge Raymond Jackson must decide whether to accept the plea agreement, and determine the sentence. A hearing has been set for March 6.

Peabody, which operates eight vessels out of a city-owned dock at the end of Jefferson Avenue, hired the illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico, on scallop boats that go to sea for up to two weeks at a time, according to the federal document. The company did so "knowing said aliens were unauthorized," and it attempted to "shield from detection said aliens for the purpose of commercial advantage and private gain," according to the charges, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court. – Newport News, Va., Daily Press

<<•>>

Friday, November 23. 2007

Natives file suit to stop anti-Pebble Mine initiative

ANCHORAGE – Prominent Native organizations have sued the state of Alaska to stop certification of two ballot initiatives, alleging the initiatives, designed to stop development of the controversial Pebble Mine prospect, are unconstitutional.

 The Association of ANCSA Regional Corp. Presidents and CEOs and the Alaska Federation of Natives joined to file a suit, naming Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell and the state as defendants, alleging the initiatives violate the Alaska Constitution. The Council of Alaska Producers, a coalition of mining companies, filed a separate suit with the same purpose in mind.

 Parnell initially rejected the first version of a proposed initiative, but his decision was overturned in October by a Dillingham Superior Court judge, who allowed the signature-gathering to begin.

 The plaintiffs allege, in part, that the initiatives violate federal law because they would prevent Native corporations from developing their mineral resources. They also allege "the initiative process cannot be used to enact laws that are beyond the power of the Legislature to enact. (The initiative) is thus not within the law-making powers of the Legislature and thus cannot be enacted by initiative."

 The initiatives would affect any metal-producing mine that is larger than 640 acres, so existing mines, including the Red Dog zinc mine near Kotzebue and the Fort Knox gold mine in Fairbanks, could be shut down if one becomes law, the pro-mining camp claims.

 But the initiatives' supporters claim they wouldn't affect existing mines, including the future operations of current facilities. Pebble's opponents aren't against mining, just this mine, said Art Hackney, a consultant for the Renewable Resources Coalition, which opposes the Pebble project.

 The decision to file suit against the state was rash and was an attempt to overstep the groups' legal bounds, he said.

 "I think it's a foolish overreaction," Hackney said. "The people have the right to petition their government."

 The initiatives would ban releasing a toxic pollutant "in a measurable amount that will affect human health or welfare or any stage of the life cycle of salmon" into surface or underground water. They would also prohibit mines from storing or disposing of mining waste or tailings that could release "acids, dissolved metals, toxic pollutants or other compounds" to waters used by people or by salmon.

 Initiative supporters hope to have the signature-gathering process complete and the proposed law on the ballot next year.

 The Pebble prospect, which straddles two river drainages that feed the massive Bristol Bay salmon fishery in Southwest Alaska, has long been the subject of controversy because of its size and location.

 It is one of the largest mineral deposits of its kind in the world, according to the mining companies exploring it. But its size and accompanying mining techniques threaten to destroy a wildly productive salmon fishery at the headwaters of Bristol Bay, critics of the mine say. – Anchorage Daily News

Britain wants higher cod quota to end waste of bycatch

LONDON – Britain is to press Brussels for higher quotas of cod stocks next year to reduce the number of dead fish thrown back into the North Sea.

 But experts say that it is too soon to allow British fishermen to catch more cod while stocks are still recovering.

 The International Council for the Exploration of Species (ICES), which advises the European Commission on fish stocks, believes that such a move could help to destroy the long-term future of the species in the North Sea and that the problem of discarded fish can be dealt with by changes to industry practices.

 The ICES is demanding that Britain’s cod quota is cut by about 50 per cent next year. The quota for this year was 20,000 tonnes, but next year the council has suggested 11,500 tonnes.

 Jonathan Shaw, the Fisheries Minister, indicated yesterday that he was ready to do battle in Europe to allow fishermen to land more cod. He blames the quota regime for the high numbers of fish — sometimes as much as 60 per cent of a catch — that must be dumped at sea. Fishermen face prosecution if they exceed their quotas. – Times of London

MSC eco-label sought for Pacific cod fisheries

SEATTLE – The Marine Stewardship Council has begun the process that will allow Pacific cod to carry its eco-label.

 The process has begun by the Alaska Fisheries Development Foundation for the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod fisheries.

 The assessment will include four gear types (longline, trawl, pot and jig), in both management areas. Currently, only a portion of the freezer longline fleet in the Bering Sea is certified to the MSC standard.

 If successful, this certification would dramatically increase the quantity of Pacific cod eligible to carry the MSC’s blue eco-label.

 Independent certifier Moody Marine International will assess the BSAI and GoA Pacific cod fisheries against the MSC standard.

 “We think the Pacific cod fisheries in Alaska, under the excellent management of the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council, the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game are great candidates for certification under the MSC standard,” said Jim Browning, Deputy Director of AFDF.

  “There is increasing demand for independently certified sustainable seafood products in the global marketplace and the MSC’s independent assessment process and traceability program will provide consumers with the assurances they are looking for.” – MSC press release

Sports fisherman likes marine protected areas

One day last year, I was trout fishing in the Upper Klamath River, near the Oregon border. Arriving at dawn, I was dismayed to find a sign on this picture-perfect river that showed only six areas open for fishing on this stretch of water. The last stretch of the river, before becoming an Oregon river, was closed to angling and called an "in river hatchery."

 After driving more than half the length of the state to fish, I was outraged.

 Dispirited, I pulled up to the first "open area," got out of my truck and took my gear down to the river. My second cast scored a nice rainbow trout. As did the next. I placed my feet carefully, and cast again. The fish leapt in the air and threw the spinner off to the side. Several casts later and I had caught my limit.

 I did this for three days in a row. The hatchery up the river had worked as a practical and natural fish reserve that had produced a large number of fish that now populate the fishable stretch of the river. A few days of great fishing changed my view of the closures. Fish reserves now seemed like a pretty good idea.

 The network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that the state Fish and Game Commission is designing with public input to run the length of the California Coast will produce similar benefits to the fish in our ocean. The first part of this network, established between Half Moon Bay and Santa Barbara in September, has left plenty of areas open to recreational fishing (more than 80 percent of the region), while preserving important areas to operate as a natural system of "hatcheries."

 Marine scientists tell us that marine reserves where fishing is not allowed increase the number, diversity, size and fertility of fish found both inside and outside of the protected areas. It's common sense that when fish are given areas to feed, breed and grow, they grow healthier, more fertile and larger. And that makes for better fishing. – Sportsman Jim Webb of San Luis Obispo writing in the San Francisco Chronicle

Oregon crabbers fear the new 14-day rule

COOS BAY — Crabbers are getting ready to set their gear but a few are concerned about a new regulation this year: The 14-day rule. It’s no secret that with the commercial crab season also comes the worst weather of the year: Storms with 30-foot waves, rain that doesn’t stop for days and wind that can topple trees. Some of the bigger boats, the steel vessels, can handle the weather. It’s often safer for them to stay at sea and ride out a storm rather than risk crossing a bar.

Still, many don’t run the risk.

And the smaller boats never do. The captains of those boats seek the parameters of the weather windows that will allow them to leave the harbor and make it back before the storm hits: Swells of only a certain height, winds lower than so many knots.

 Oregon’s new regulation relates to gear left unattended and reads: “It is unlawful for commercial purposes to have Dungeness crab gear deployed in the Pacific Ocean or Columbia River more than 14 days without making a landing of Dungeness crab.”

Some small-boat owners say the rule is a death sentence, forcing boats to fish in rough weather.

The state says that bad weather is understandable and it would never expect fishermen to cross rough bars to tend their gear — after all, neither would enforcement boats.

Abuse triggered rule

 The 14-day rule was a compromise, worked out during industry meetings, discussions among the fleet and at Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission meetings.

 Flagrant abuse by some boats to leave their gear in the ocean for weeks or months at a time — thereby staking out territory without actually using it and possibly leaving crab stuck in pots for days — was the real issue, Oregon State Police Lt. Jeff Samuels said.

Crabbers fishing legally couldn’t access those pots, Samuels said.

Oregon went through a grueling process to institute a pot limit program a couple years ago. Some crabbers say it pitted fishermen against fishermen, with bad feelings among some of the fleet who invested heavily in gear but were allocated fewer pots to fish.

 The state’s program has three tiers: 200 pots, 300 and 500. Fishermen get a permit based on past fishing practice. Washington has only two tiers, a 300-pot tier and a 500.

 But there are unintended consequences of any new program.

 “There was some cheating going on,” Samuels said of the 2006-07 season, the first to implement the pot limit rules.  

 The OSP worked with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Coast Guard for two weeks in January and February, patrolling the crab grounds. They found more than 200 violations of the pot limit regulations and seized more than 100 unlawful crab pots from about 14 boats.

OSP also received tips from fishermen, Samuels said.

He said instances such as one boat’s pots being fished while the boat was in drydock, multiple permit holders using one vessel to fish all the pots, or one boat’s pots left in the ocean while the boat was fishing in Alaska were reported.

Other violations could have occurred, but the problem is that OSP would have to actually catch the boat running its gear — not an easy task with time, budget and personnel constraints.

“This rule is about giving enforcement a tool to combat those types of events,” Samuels said.

Discretion is needed

The rule still has small-boat crabbers concerned.

In Pacific City, fishermen trailer their boats to the beach, then launch the small wooden dories through the surf.

Dory fisherman Craig Wenrick said he said he attended the October commission meeting at which the 14-day regulation was adopted and, after reviewing his records, found at least two weeks of every year that he couldn’t access his gear.

“It’s strictly weather-related,” he said. “I don’t have many options.”

Port Orford is another small-boat port. Boats there are lifted out of the water by crane after fishing trips.

Crabber Chris Aiello said the rule doesn’t allow for non-weather-related events, such as a death in the family, breakdowns or something else.

“But it’s still valued to maintain the integrity of one boat, one set of gear,” Aiello said.

Although he can see the need for the rule, it’s still a concern.

“That’s what worries us – if they (enforcement) go by the letter of the law, if anyone can’t pull their gear for 14 days, they can get a ticket,” Aiello said. “The State Police will have to use discretion.”

And discretion is exactly what Samuels said the police have in mind.

“It’s not about the State Police having someone tracking fish tickets,” he said.

The key to bringing any formal legal action against a crab pot permit holder will still be proof: Police will have to get in a boat, cross a bar and go to sea to document the location and identity of the permit holder’s pots the state suspects may be left unattended or being fished illegally.

If there’s bad weather keeping boats — large or small — at dock, local troops will know about it, Samuels said.

 “We aren’t going out in bad weather, either.” – Coos Bay World