pf home
Summary for December 3 - December 7, 2007:

Monday, December 3. 2007

Coast Guard plucks injured man off vessel

TILLAMOOK – The Coast Guard rescued a man who was struck by a crab pot and injured while out on the Tillamook coast Saturday.

 The 24-year-old man was airlifted from a fishing vessel and taken to a nearby hosptial where he was treated for his injuries.

 The master of a 77-foot vessel, Lady Kate, contacted Coast Guard Air Station Astoria to request assistance for the man. – KGW, Portland

Venerable fishing vessel gone

If the Lou Denny Wayne returns to Santa Cruz, it will be hauled piece by piece down Highway 1.

 The trip would be far less majestic than the commercial fishing craft's first voyage into town, a flag-waving entrance chronicled by a photo in the Sentinel in January 1951.

 The historic commercial fishing craft well-known in the Santa Cruz Small Craft Harbor wrecked against the rocks about a mile south of Pigeon Point early Thursday.

 On Friday, recovery efforts became salvage work.

 "This will be the end of it," said Mike Velasquez, a friend of the boat's captain Leo Morelli of Santa Cruz, who was helping remove the boat from the surf Friday afternoon.

 Morelli and his son, Gabriel Riddle, 21, took the 39-foot, 6-inch purse seiner on a commercial crabbing trip up the North Coast late Wednesday but ran into trouble around 1 a.m. when the vessel hit an unknown object and started taking on water.

 Morelli told television reporters he purposely crashed the boat into the rocks to save his son, who jumped into the water and swam to shore. The captain stayed aboard the damaged craft and sent out a distress call at 1:15 a.m. A U.S. Coast Guard helicopter from San Francisco rescued him from the boat and San Mateo County sheriff's deputies helped Riddle up the 100-foot bluff to safety. Neither man was injured. – Santa Cruz Sentinel

SF oil spill sparks memories of Exxon Valez

The oil spill in San Francisco Bay also hit people in my hometown of Cordova, the native village of Chenega, Port Graham, Kodiak, Chignik - and all other of the 22 Alaskan communities directly affected by the Exxon Valdez spill more than 18 years ago.

 The reason Exxon Valdez survivors literally "feel your pain" is that disaster trauma is stored in memory with no time tag other than "present." No matter what else of significance happens in a person's life, trauma memory is able to trump it all in an unguarded moment.

 As an Exxon Valdez survivor, the intensity of emotion that flooded over me when I learned of the spill in San Francisco Bay was as real as when I first experienced it two decades ago.

 Besides wishing to extend my sympathy to those harmed by the Cosco Busan spill, I hope to share some of what we in Alaska learned the hard way, so that survivors might avoid our mistakes.

 The spilled oil will take its toll on wildlife, your beautiful beaches and bays, commercial and sport fisheries and fishing-based businesses, tourism and recreational businesses, local governments that depend on these businesses for tax revenue, and more.

 You will be surprised to learn, as we were, that despite public promises to "make us whole" from the spiller - in our case, Exxon Corp. - actual damages are quite limited under maritime law.

 This ancient law is rooted in past centuries when the need to protect the critical shipping industry trumped the needs of most other industries.

 We now find ourselves in the U.S. Supreme Court having to defend what remains of our punitive damage award. In its appeal, ExxonMobil has invoked the Amiable Nancy, a nearly 200-year-old maritime law that limits the liability of ship owners from reckless mistakes of their captains -- in that case, from pirate captains plundering other vessels for profit.

 In the two centuries before ExxonMobil dredged up the Amiable Nancy ruling from Davy Jones' locker, crude oil rose to dominance as a global energy source. Much of this oil is shipped to markets in some of the world's largest ships - supertankers carrying millions of gallons. Sophisticated communications make it possible for responsible ship owners to stay in daily contact with their captains.

 The liability of ship owners was -- and is still -- largely limited to commercial fishermen and private landowners who were directly oiled. All other claims will be tossed out, as they were in our case.

 If the Exxon Valdez case is a harbinger of litigation to come, it does not bode well for people, civic society or the environment. In our case, simply put, a giant corporation used its wealth to aggressively drive up legal expenses and to reduce, delay, and eliminate payment of awards to spill victims for more than 18 years -- and counting.

 But the loss goes far deeper than economic damages. Oil spills in coastal seas create long sticky tendrils of disaster trauma that emotionally scar everyone they touch. Mental health counselors are overwhelmed with those having difficulty coping with disruptions to daily work and play routines, feelings of loss of control over one's life, loss of quality time to visit with family and friends, intrusive dreams, and gnawing worries over an uncertain future.

 Heaping fuel on the fire was the very tool given to us to "make us whole" -- class-action litigation. We experienced a secondary spill disaster through prolonged litigation that created as much trauma for spill victims as the initial spill.

 Psychologists found that adversarial litigation emotionally "arrests" disaster-scarred survivors, forcing them to keep the disaster trauma alive and present until case closure. Further, litigation generates new trauma, which amounts to a double helping of stress for disaster victims.

 For us in Cordova -- as it will be for you in San Francisco -- it's not about whether the Supreme Court should hear the case. It's about justice and reparation, making injured parties whole. It's about more than an oil spill.

 We ask all of you who share in the cost of oil spill cleanup as taxpayers and in the devastation of this spill as owners of public resources - oiled wildlife and oiled public lands - to join us in defeating ExxonMobil's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. It is time to retire outdated laws like the Amiable Nancy.

 But perhaps it is also time for Americans to question whether the adversarial litigation system is really the best way to ascertain truth, ensure fairness and dispense justice.

And we in Cordova offer some suggestions for rebuilding our American justice system:

-- Post-disaster disputes could be minimized during preliminary planning and scoping of projects by negotiated, legally binding agreements.

-- Financial incentives and rules could be created to encourage dispute resolution through non-adversarial negotiated settlements.

-- Incentives could be created to shorten litigation timelines by eliminating mechanisms that reward profits through stalling.

 In Cordova, we hope that it is just a matter of time before these suggestions or other similar ones are demanded by professionals, activists, and victims fed up with the American "injustice system," archaic irrelevant laws, and oil spills.

 We also encourage those of you (including the state) who are considering lawsuits to demand instead negotiated settlements with a three- to five-year timeline. This will bring closure and allow you to move on with your lives, something we found that is as important as reparation. – Riki Ott, Ph.D., a community activist and former fisherm'am, writing in the San Francisco Chronicle

Crab vessel sinks off B.C.

PRINCE RUPERT – At 5 a.m. on Saturday, Nov. 24 the Freyed Knot put out a mayday call after the vessel rolled over off of Rose Spit.

 The 32-foot crab fishing vessel had three crew on board at the time when it went hard aground at Toe Hill beach. The three people aboard were standing on the stern of the Freyed Knot in survival suits, and were advised to stay with the vessel as long as possible.

 The vessel did not have a skiff, although the crew had a deflated raft but were not willing to get into it. Another fishing vessel, the Leski Spirit was in the area and turned about to assist. The Leski Spirit did not feel it was able to tow them off, and Coast Guard concurred it was not a good plan.

 Coast Guard did dispatch the Cormorant helicopter from Comox, and the Point Henry was on scene at 9 a.m. with the Point Henry 2 assisting.

 Another assisting vessel was able to get the Freyed Knot off the sandbar, and the vessel was towed to Masset where it was secured at 2:31 p.m.

 Weather at the time was two to three foot northwest swells, and the wind was blowing at 15 knots from the northeast, which is considered to be fairly good weather for the area.  – Prince Rupert Daily News

Oregon crabbers pulling pots, if they get out

CHARLESTON, Ore. – The Charleston crab fleet is hitting the waters, trying to bring as much crab in as possible before the predicted extreme storm hits the south coast.

The Gloria vessel was the first to land their gear Saturday after the crabbing season officially started at midnight.

Captain Jeff Reeves says it was a rough night with poor conditions, but most crabbers want to get the most bang for their buck before this storm moves in.

"It's predicted to be one of the biggest weather events that I can recall. The crab gear will get moved around. Some of it may go completely away. We've seen pots in a significant weather event last year roll 50 miles up the coast."

In order to salvage their gear, crabbers hope to land most of it before the conditions get bad enough to sand in the pots.

Reeves brought in about a ton of crab and based on competitive pricing he's expecting to get around two-dollars a pound.

"Crabs look great, I didn't have much. Would've liked to have three times that much, but I did run only one crab screen."

Crabbers seem to be positive about this season, and are hoping the quantity of crab keeps up with the quality. – KCBY,  Coos Bay

 <<<•>>>

Tuesday, December 4. 2007

Farmed salmon lawsuit taken to California Supreme Court

LOS ANGELES -- What could unite such fierce competitors as Bristol Farms, Costco, Safeway, Albertsons, Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe's? A group of fish-eating consumers who want to know whether the salmon in the stores' display cases is wild or farmed.

 The grocery giants have formed an unlikely alliance to fight a legal bid by 11 consumers who contend that California markets have failed to clearly distinguish salmon caught in the wild from its farm-raised cousin, which is injected with red dye to appear more palatable. It's a claim grocers deny.

 "I'm very concerned about what I put into my body," said Jennifer Kanter, a 32-year-old Los Angeles sales professional who is one of those who filed the lawsuit.

 Although federal and state laws require suppliers to clearly label salmon containing dye, officials from the Food and Drug Administration and the California Department of Public Health acknowledge that because of limited resources, they don't actively enforce the rule.

 The California Supreme Court has scheduled arguments in the upcoming weeks.

 Salmon is big business. It is a food recommended by the American Heart Association, and consumption of it has quintupled in 16 years. Much of the demand is met by the farm-raised variety.

 Critics say salmon farming poses environmental and health concerns. The fish are raised in nets in bays and inlets; excess fish meal and waste from the fish cause pollution. The meal, which is used to fatten the salmon, contains small amounts of dioxin and other harmful chemicals, according to a study cited by the plaintiffs. The fish waste harms the ocean's ecosystem, scientists say.

 In a study last year, a consumer advocacy group tested salmon advertised as wild in markets in the Northeast and found that about half contained dye without labels disclosing the fact.

 "People were paying a premium for wild salmon, and we're not getting it," said Nancy Metcalf, author of the survey for Consumers Union.

 No such studies have been done in California, she said.

 Kanter grew up in Seattle, where she fished for salmon. It wasn't until she moved to Los Angeles five years ago that she learned that some of the fish in markets was actually farm-raised.

 "I didn't know you could have anything but wild-caught salmon. I had never seen (it) before," she said. "I just knew that it wasn't what I was used to. It's gray."

 Concerned that the labeling rule wasn't being enforced, Kanter and others went to court three years ago contending that they should have the right to demand that information from suppliers when authorities fail to do so.

 The original lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages and class-action status, alleges that consumers bought unlabeled dyed salmon that was sold by "the nation's largest and most sophisticated grocery chains." The argument was rejected by lower courts and is now before the California Supreme Court.

 Rex Heinke, attorney for Kroger (parent of Ralphs), Safeway and Albertsons, said the job of enforcing the labeling rule is up to federal regulators, not consumers.

 "Congress wanted uniform enforcement of these laws nationwide. We don't dispute that if the state government jumps through the right procedural hoops, they can enforce the law too, if the federal government doesn't object," Heinke said. "But nowhere is there any mention of consumers enforcing."

 Craig R. Spiegel, a lawyer for the consumers, said the implications of the suit "go way beyond the facts of this case."

 "The holding is not limited in any way to food coloring," he said. "The decision says whenever conduct violates both state and federal law, consumers cannot go to court to enforce the regulations."

 The suit has the backing of a dozen prosecutors, California Attorney General Jerry Brown and Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo.

 According to papers filed by Kamala Harris, San Francisco County's district attorney, if California's justices don't intervene, the lower court rulings will "destroy local civil law enforcement action safeguarding the public against unlawful and deceptive practices in the sale of food and other products." – San Jose Mercury News

Questions arise from Oregon plan for marine protected areas

NEWPORT, Ore. – How large is large? How small is small? How many? Why is this process underway? What is the need?

These and other pressing questions emerged from recent sessions focused on how to more effectively get the message out about Gov. Ted Kulongoski's proposed process for nominating and establishing designated marine reserves in Oregon's territorial sea.

Representatives of different entities with varying viewpoints on the issue gathered Monday at Hatfield Marine Science Center in Newport to offer feedback to the governor's staff and the state's Ocean Policy Advisory Council (OPAC) on ways to enhance outreach efforts pertaining to marine reserves.

 "For some, outreach may mean doing a workshop or two in a community, then calling it a day," said Onno Husing, director of the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Association (OCZMA), who attended the session. "Outreach should be an effort to establish real and enduring relationships. I also believe outreach needs to be a genuine two-way street -- a process where information is not just issued, but an iterative journey where informed and constructive feedback finds its way back into policy development. That means using feedback to adjust expectations, strategies, outcomes, and schedules."

Effective feedback, he and others say, begins at the local level within the coastal communities and fisheries that would directly absorb the socioeconomic effects of designated marine reserves.

Much discussion at the gathering focused on a memo to OPAC's Marine Reserves Working Group from Ginny Goblirsch, a Port of Newport commissioner, and Jeff Feldner, a commercial fisherman and Oregon State University Sea Grant fisheries specialist.

 They met with the Oregon Salmon Commission on Nov. 19 and Lincoln County's Fishermen Involved with Natural Energy (FINE) committee on Nov. 20, where they briefed the fishermen on the current marine reserve designation process, and gleaned feedback about what role, if any, fishermen were willing to play.

Initially harsh response toward the process, especially the timeline, gradually softened somewhat, giving way to "the desire to be closely involved" with it.

"Most ultimately shared a strong opinion that for the best possible outcome for their fishing businesses, their communities, and OPAC's goals with marine reserves, the process needed to be refocused to the local level for both nominations and recommendations on final siting," Goblirsch and Feldner noted. While some fishermen agreed they could identify some locations that would not negatively impact fisheries, others indicated they would not support the process under any conditions.

Individuals and groups from coastal ports, communities, fisheries, and other entities have submitted letters, comments, and resolutions. Most reflect the same concerns expressed by fishers:

The current process and timeline are unrealistic. The process should anchor in coastal communities, with fishermen a part of it from the outset. Adequate funding is vital for mapping, gathering baseline data, performing ongoing research, monitoring and enforcement, and offsetting socioeconomic impacts. The process must also include other set-asides already in place or under consideration, such as existing marine protected areas and wave energy parks, which further restrict fishing opportunities.

"Without working on these in a coordinated manner, wave parks could damage more habitat than is preserved by marine reserves," Goblirsch and Feldner stated.

More questions surfaced. Since the territorial sea is already managed for sustainable resources and economic benefits to coastal communities, why is this process underway? What is the need? What are the socioeconomic impacts? How can they best incorporate the best possible information into the nomination and selection process? These same basic queries have welled up every time folks who live, work, and play on the coast discuss the issue.

"This issue and other issues which so directly impact coastal communities and fishermen go beyond perceived economic threats," the outreach memo stated. "These issues are seen as potentially threatening to the history, culture, and way of life on the coast."

In a follow-up letter to fishermen invited to a Nov. 1 forum to discuss marine reserves and wave energy with him, Gov. Kulongoski stated the fishing industry "must play an essential role in wave energy and marine reserve siting decisions," and assured them he was "committed to ensuring that future wave energy development and establishment of a limited system of marine reserves do not interrupt traditional fishing practices on Oregon's Territorial Sea."

The basic question stemming from the governor's statement -- one that underpins all others -- is: how can marine reserves not impact fisheries?

Because the governor has already made the decision to establish marine reserves, the focus is on how to proceed with a plan that won't face formidable opposition from those whose livelihoods are most at stake.

"The governor's office staff needs to establish a basis for trust (which does not currently exist) in this process," the Goblirsch/Feldner memo concluded. "Coastal community interests must have a voice in the governor's office. It would help if the governor asked for coastal assistance and support directly."

Onno Husing said a key aspect is to gather up-front information about any potential socioeconomic impacts from any proposed marine reserve nomination, because right now no one is taking the time or devoting resources to develop socioeconomic models to accurately judge the impacts of removing more ocean space from sports and commercial fisheries. Above all, it must occur locally.

"That doesn't mean Oregonians who don't reside on the coast would be shut out of the process. On the contrary," he noted. "Ask yourself this question: What's wrong with asking someone from Portland or Corvallis who has a marine reserve nomination for a chunk of ocean off Lincoln County to bring their nomination before a group of impacted ocean users and other community leaders from Lincoln County?" – Newport, Ore., News-Times

Gravel beds in Fraser River threatened

VANCOUVER – Swift and sweeping action is needed by all government levels to protect the 90-km gravel reach between Hope and Mission that represents the most biologically rich part of the Fraser River, says a report for the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council.

 The 111-page report, titled Saving the Heart of the Fraser, said the reach represents "some of Canada's most biologically significant riparian and aquatic ecosystems" and is under "extreme stress" from activities such as urban growth, agriculture, resource extraction and industrial development.

 The Fraser River flows 1,370 km from its headwaters at Mount Robson Provincial Park to the Strait of Georgia at Vancouver, draining 236,000 square km or about one-quarter of the province.

 At least 30 different species of fish spawn, rear or migrate through this part of the lower Fraser River, including more than 10 million pink salmon in peak years and an endangered population of sturgeon that is the source of a popular catch-and-release sport fishery.

 The report says current environmental law is "insufficient to protect this environmentally unique and economically valuable Canadian ecosystem," noting habitat is at risk from a "bias towards development and the momentum generated by the growing population in the region."

 The report is authored by council deputy chair Mark Angelo and biologist Marvin Rosenau, a former provincial fish biologist, both of whom are with BCIT's fish, wildlife and recreation program.

 "The heart of the Fraser has internationally renowned fisheries values and is one of the most productive stretches of river anywhere in the world," Angelo said.

The report states that despite 150 years of impact, there is much biodiversity in the lower Fraser River that can still be saved. It recommends:

 -- All levels of government -- federal, provincial, local and first nations -- devise a consensus-based plan of immediate measures to stem the losses of irreplaceable ecosystems.

-- Research to identify the sites needing immediate protection, purchasing private sites where possible or protecting them via covenant, perhaps through organizations such as The Nature Trust or the Sto:lo Trust.

-- Converting important Crown sites -- and perhaps even reserve lands, with first nations approval -- to protected areas, with the use of land trades to preserve aboriginal interests.

-- Restoring areas of the river that have been damaged over the years, including potential removal of non-essential rip-rap armour used for shoreline protection.

-- Reducing shoreline damage associated with commercial cottonwood plantations as well as gravel extraction, and stemming the loss of agricultural land.

-- Investigating the importance of large woody debris as habitat in the lower Fraser River, and the effect on fish of the Agassiz debris trap, which is meant to reduce damage to boats downstream.

-- Better law enforcement in the lower river, and the recognition that damaging fish habitat should be considered a serious violation.

 The council provides independent policy advice to the B.C. and federal governments for a sustainable fish resource, including protection of habitat.

Council board members include former federal fisheries minister John Fraser, chairman and retired University of B.C. oceanography professor Paul LeBlond, B.C. Aboriginal Fisheries Commission chairman Arnie Narcisse, and Jeff Marliave, vice-president of marine science at the Vancouver Aquarium.—Press release

Biologists worry about California salmon number

MERCED, Calif.—Biologists are concerned by a rapid decline in the number of Chinook salmon spawning in the Merced, Tuolumne and Stanislaus rivers this year.

 The California Department of Fish and Game expects fewer than 500 salmon will spawn in the Merced River this year, down from 1,200 last year.

 Chinook salmon typically spend several years in the ocean before returning to inland streams and rivers to spawn. One biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said this year's low fish count could spell crisis for the population.

 Scientists are exploring how loss of habitat, murky water conditions, low water flows, high temperatures and toxic algae are affecting the species. – San Jose Mercury News

 <<<•>>>

Wednesday,December 5, 2007 

Deadliest catch? Not in Alaska
This article also appeared in our Wild News service,

ILWACO, Wash. – They head out to sea in pursuit of a crab's sweet meat. Months of sleep-deprived labor can pull in hundreds of thousands of dollars for a top-grossing vessel. Their death toll — 17 lives lost in the past seven years — makes this the most lethal Pacific harvest.

 These are not the Bering Sea crabbers who gained fame on the Discovery Channel's reality series, Deadliest Catch, but the Dungeness-crab crews who toil in anonymity off the Washington and Oregon coasts.

 Since 2000, their death rate has been 50 percent higher than that of Bering Sea crabbers and four times the rate of all U.S. fishermen, federal statistics show.

 "We're the deadliest catch," says Mike Banks, the Oregon skipper of the 38-foot Alexa B, which on Saturday joined several hundred crabbers for the opening of the new Dungeness season off Oregon and part of Washington.

 "We're fishing in the Pacific Ocean, where the storms blow 3,000 miles in from Japan."

 These Northwest crabbers take pride in a fishery that still has room for the little guy, who can break into the harvest with far less capital than required to fish the Bering Sea. Most Northwest crab boats range in length from 30 to 80 feet, far smaller than most Bering Sea crab boats, which can reach more than 180 feet.

 Both fleets face severe weather this time of year, when the crabs are at their prime.

 Bering Sea squalls can coat gear and decks with freezing spray, making boats dangerously top-heavy. That's rare on Northwest waters, but the local fleet still gets rocked by storms. Saturday's opening came as forecasters warned of a monster storm capable of spinning out 40-foot seas and hurricane-force winds. Most boats were expected to stay in port.

 The Northwest fleet also must navigate treacherous river sandbars to enter and exit ports. Last year, Oregon bars claimed seven commercial crabbers — three in February when the Catherine M capsized trying to cross the Tillamook Bar with a load of Dungeness crab.

  Then on Dec. 16, the vessel Ash capsized off the mouth of the Rogue River. Four died.

 "He was trying to get some income for the holidays and had just crossed the bar," said Cecil Ashdown, widow of 44-year-old skipper, Rob Ashdown. "Then the sneaker waves hit. The first one, they were able to ride out, and the second one flipped them over."

 In the seven-year stretch ending last year, the Dungeness fleet suffered five capsizings that claimed 14 crew members, while three others died in separate incidents. Thirteen deaths happened in Oregon waters, four off the Washington coast.

 Northwest crabbers say the fatalities reflect the intense competition, as small and large boats battle to grab as much crab as fast as possible. The danger grows with fatigue, or alcohol and drug abuse. This past January, a young Oregon skipper tested positive for methamphetamine after a disastrous bar crossing that killed one of his crew.

 There are also newcomers, with the biggest churn in the larger Oregon fleet, with some 450 permits.

 "You get greenhorns who buy boats and get to thinking they are going to make the big bucks," said Gary Wintersteen, a 30-year veteran who crabs off Oregon. "Inexperience kills."

 Coast Guard officials say the Northwest fleet includes some poorly maintained vessels, and skippers who scrimp on required emergency drills. They are troubled by the fatalities.

 "We're looking at a pretty major problem and I don't think we have come to grips with it as an agency," said Cmdr. Chris Woodley, of the Coast Guard's district office in Seattle.

 To try to shrink the death toll, the Coast Guard now conducts dockside safety checks before the season starts. For four days, 38 inspectors fanned out to check the fleet. Inspections are not mandatory — 13 skippers refused to let the Coast Guard board. Some 200 agreed.

 Inspectors checked life rafts, emergency locator beacons and survival suits.

 "It's pretty cool having you guys out here doing this," said Bob Shaw, a 51-year-old skipper from Arch Cape, Ore. Shaw is a veteran of Alaska and Northwest fisheries who recalls two mishaps from his early career that required Coast Guard rescues. He veered off to pursue technology but recently bought the 56-foot Double Eagle and rejoined the crab harvest.

 As a Coast Guard inspector waxed the zipper of a survival suit, Chris Burton, a member of Shaw's crew, decided to try one on. A stout man, Burton struggled unsuccessfully to pull on the bulky suit. He tried a second, larger one. It fit — crucial knowledge should he ever have to abandon ship.

 After four days, the Coast Guard's list of deficiencies included six vessels with bad survival suits, 11 with expired batteries on emergency locator beacons and at least a half-dozen boats with improperly installed life rafts.

 These dockside checks were inspired by a program that began in Alaska in 1999. Those checks have more bite because the crab vessels are required to have stability instructions — developed by a naval architect — that specify a maximum number of pots. The checks were supplemented by vessel inspections that the state of Alaska now requires for participation in the Bering Sea harvests.

 Fatalities among Alaska's crabbers have shrunk dramatically. Between 2000 and 2006, 11 crabbers died — compared to more than 45 during the previous seven years. Coast Guard officials note that the downturn began long before 2005, when a new harvest system ended the race for the crab by giving vessels predetermined shares of the catch.

 "The biggest single preventive thing we did was start enforcing the stability rules," said Woodley, who helped pioneer the program.

 But it's difficult for the Coast Guard to determine the stability of the Northwest fleet. Most of the crab boats are less than 79 feet and thus exempt from having to hire a naval architect to develop stability instructions that guide the loading of pots.

 The Coast Guard is considering a rule that would require all vessels 50 feet or longer to have such stability guidelines if they are new or undergo major renovation.

 "The whole crux of the issue is to know how much is too much," said Michael Rosecrans, the Coast Guard chief of fishing-vessel safety. "They [crabbers] think they understand that, but they don't always understand."

 The Coast Guard is considering other proposals, as well, including one to beef up restrictions when boats attempt to cross the river bars.

 All this safety talk makes some crabbers uneasy. They worry about more bureaucracy and rules that they fear will force out more small operators.

 "I don't want any more Coast Guard involvement, no way," said Banks, the Oregon skipper.

 Banks carefully planned his strategy for the season opening, with the approaching storm putting fishermen and Coast Guard teams on edge.

 A few hours before midnight, he guided his boat over a turbulent Columbia River bar, a run complicated by navigation rules that required him to turn off his deck lights so as not to hamper the vision of oncoming river pilots.

 Out at sea, the crabbing was hot. Banks and his three crew pulled in some 15,000 pounds of Dungeness to fill their hold in about eight hours. Then, as the winds picked up, and waves occasionally began to wash across the stern deck, they scurried back to port. – Seattle Times

Rough water, tough fishing

EUREKA – Here’s a roundup of the opening of Dungeness season:

 EUREKA: Reported offshore wind gusts of 60 mph and swells topping 24 feet put a crimp in the crab season Monday, but December’s first storm did surprisingly little damage on land as rains and winds tapered off Monday night.

The danger today, said National Weather Service meteorologist Jeff Lawitsky, is a high surf warning that will remain in effect until 3 a.m. Wednesday.

“Big story (today) is big swell, big waves — 23 to 27 feet — even bigger than (Monday’s) in our forecast,” NWS warning coordinator meteorologist Troy Nicolini said.

New idea: An 'acoustic' fence for salmon

New Zealand's first acoustic fish fence, designed to stop salmon smolt being lost in irrigation water, has been installed and tested.

At a cost of around $1 million the Rangitata Diversion Race Management Limited has installed the 58 million bubble and sound system designed to discourage salmon and divert them into a bypass back to the Rangitata River.

 In the late ‘90s, research found that 200,000 smolt went down the system and while 20,000 crossed Mid Canterbury and entered the Rakaia River, the rest were lost to the fishery.

 RDR manager John Young said metal screens were soon shown to be ineffective. Algae quickly built up and silt just stuck to it.

 With the arrival of didymo in the Rangitata the choice of an acoustic fence was fortuitous.

 The system has to be proven to work and there is a computer controlled monitoring system so that when a fish passes through the bypass it triggers a video recording.

The acoustic fence will be fully operational by winter when the salmon eggs laid this summer develop into smolt and run to the ocean. – Stuff, New Zealand

What were they thinking?

DILLINGHAM – Five people spent the night on the icy waters of Bristol Bay, their aluminum boats stranded, before being hoisted to safety by the Coast Guard Tuesday morning.

 The five, whose names were not immediately released, were taken to the hospital in Dillingham, where they were checked for hypothermia, the Coast Guard said.

 The stranded boaters were reported missing at about 7 p.m. Monday. A Coast Guard helicopter found them at about 6 a.m. Wednesday, one-quarter mile from Naknek.

 The boats -- a 16-footer and a 14-footer -- became stuck while one was pulling the other, the Coast Guard said. – Anchorage Daily News

To the Editor: Trawlers killing halibut

The North Pacific Fishery Council begins its December round. One hot topic will be halibut bycatch by the trawlers. Apparently they’ve killed between 50 and 100 percent more than they should have caught. In a dollar reduction of the Area 3 halibut fishery (that’s us) it’s a cut of $10 to $20 million and it comes out of the pockets of the individual quota halibut fleet and local processors.

 The problem is there’s virtually no observer coverage in the Gulf of Alaska. The Bering Sea trawl fleet is monitored about 85 percent of the time, while our GOA trawl fleet, that is supposed to be monitored at 30 percent, has figured out ways to game the system so that the actual monitoring may be as low as 10 percent. National Marine Fisheries Service enforcement, that made a bust on one of the observer games in ’05, is out front wanting change, saying the trawl fleet should be held to the rules.

 At the center of the debate is Jim Balsiger. He’s the head of the halibut commission. He’s also regional director of NMFS in Juneau and, as such, votes on the NPFMC. At the council meeting in Anchorage in October he voted to continue the slaughter of halibut.

 Newly appointed Duncan Fields sat by and didn’t say a word. It’s unknown how high the price of halibut has to get before these gentlemen will consider them worth saving.

Balsiger’s situation is especially interesting, serving two masters as he does. As head of the halibut commission he’s sworn to protect halibut, as a member of the council he bends the rules for the trawl industry. He should do the right thing and resign one position.

 Thanks to Bill Alwert for the figures above. He has all the collaborating data and invites any doubters to check it out.  – John Finley, wrrting to the Kodiak Daily Mirror

 <<<•>>>

Thursday, December , 2007 

 Search ends for missing California crabbers

The waves rolling across the fishing grounds off the San Mateo County coast were well over 20 feet Tuesday, big enough to keep most veteran fishermen in port.

 Two San Leandro men who had laid their crab pots a few days before decided to chance it. The men, Benjamin Hannaberg, 58, and James Davis, 57, apparently paid for that decision with their lives.

 The Coast Guard suspended a search Wednesday for the missing men, having found no sign of the two and only a few bits and pieces of what might have been their boat, the Good Guys.

 Officials said there was little hope that Hannaberg and Davis, described by family and friends as experienced sport fishermen, would be found alive.

 "At this point, it's not very likely" they survived, said Dan Temko, master of the Pillar Point Harbor near Half Moon Bay, where the 25-foot fiberglass boat that Hannaberg owned was berthed.

 "Unless they were in a life raft or emergency suits, it would be very difficult to survive through the night."

 The Coast Guard suspended its search more than 20 hours after the boat was reported missing about 1:30 p.m. Tuesday, saying the two fisherman probably couldn't have lived more than eight hours in the 53-degree water, rough seas and cold air.

 A small amount of debris was sighted in the water, including the boat's emergency beacon, which broadcast an electronic signal Tuesday after the Good Guys was reported missing.

 Searchers on shore found three chunks of fiberglass that might have come from the hull and what appeared to be a boat seat, harbor officials said.

 "The type of debris that's being found on the beach would indicate the vessel broke up," Temko said. – San Francisco Chronicle

My turn: creating rural jobs and saving Alaska's soul

Fourteen people showed up at Elfin Cove's community potluck Thanksgiving dinner. This was somewhat surprising because the year-round population of the isolated Southeast community had dropped off to single digits in recent years.

 Elfin Cove boasted a year-round population of 50 only a decade ago, but young families drifted away as the school closed and charter sport fishing vessels displaced trollers on the salmon grounds. While the boardwalks of the picturesque village are busy during the summer, there are just a few lights on during the long winter nights.

 This slow death of a once vibrant community is likely to be repeated many times in the coming decades, as energy costs skyrocket, commercial fishing opportunities shrink and global warming takes its toll. As these slices of frontier life die the Alaska soul will wither.

 Should we even try to save these villages? Certainly the state could spend a lot of money trying to support communities that have no economic base. And, as the only state with no statewide sales or income tax, what does Alaska have to give? The answer, at least for the coming year, is plenty. The recent change in petroleum taxes combined with all-time high oil prices might result in the state having $2 billion in surplus revenues during the coming year.

 My family ties have been traced back through records by a family historian to 1798 when our Aleut grandmother married a Russian sailor. One of the saddest changes I've witnessed during my own six decades in Alaska has been the loss of the strong feeling of community that came from shared isolation and hardship. Life in urban Alaska has become very easy and differs little from anywhere else in the country, and today we are asking how we can bridge a growing urban-rural divide.

 Our population is so transient that many Alaskans fail to recognize how much our urban centers depend upon the economic health of rural communities. The economies of Anchorage, Mat-Su, Fairbanks and Juneau all depend upon natural resources harvested and processed in other areas or by servicing rural communities.

 While I've been a resident of Juneau for the past three decades, I continue to draw my spiritual essence from my time on the water at my remote oyster farm, doing many of the same things my ancestors have done for centuries. But this question keeps coming to mind: How are future generations going to continue to make a living from the sea?

 For many coastal residents, one option is tourism. I, for one, hope my great-grandchildren don't end up selling T-shirts and lattes to tourists or living in communities that more closely resemble Fishermen's Wharf in San Francisco than Alaska.

 So what should Alaska do? There are some models and tools in place to help rural Alaska survive into the next millennium. One of the most interesting is the Community Development Quota system created by the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council. Consortiums of Bering Sea communities have been given a share of the lucrative pollock and crab fisheries to use in developing the local economies.

 The potential of this system can be seen in Atka, an Aleut village located near Adak. The Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association built a small processing plant and helped put local skippers behind the wheels of modern fishing vessels. When I visited Atka five years ago, everyone who wanted to work had a job and workers were coming from other communities to work in the processing plant.

 As we continue to move toward becoming indistinguishable from the rest of America, I believe it is vital that we attempt to preserve some of what makes us unique. Face it, our image of the "real Alaskan" isn't someone who gets caught in rush hour traffic or goes shopping at a big-box store.

 The creation of new, sustainable jobs in rural communities will help build a more solid economic base for the entire state, fuel the service economies of urban centers, and preserve some of what makes Alaska so unique. – Juneau Empire

• Rodger Painter operates a remote oyster farm on Prince of Wales Island and is president of the Alaskan Shellfish Growers Association. He is a Juneau resident.

Fraser River's problem: No one pays attention

You'd expect that ignoring a 1,400-kilometre river -- with a mouth that runs through a metropolitan area of more than 2 million people -- would be difficult, but a recent report suggests this is precisely what many of us do when it comes to the Fraser River.

 "It's a case of out-of-sight, out-of-mind for many people in the Lower Mainland and that's why we're trying to raise public awareness," says Mark Angelo, co-author of a recently-released report, Saving The Heart of the Fraser, which urges all government levels to act immediately to protect key habitats along the river, especially the reach running from Hope to Mission.

 Angelo is deputy chair of the independent Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council and, along with co-author Dr. Marvin Rosenau, he's produced this 140-page report that raises a warning flag over growing threats from development and urbanization to this crucial 90-kilometre stretch of the Fraser.

 "The lower Fraser River's floodplain and channels represent some of Canada's most biologically significant riverside and aquatic ecosystems, but this part of the river lies at the doorstep of over 2 million people in the Lower Mainland," says Angelo, who along with his co-author is also a member of BCIT's fish, wildlife and recreation program.

 Ironically, a few days after the Resource Conservation Council released its report, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans released its preliminary 2008 salmon forecast on the Fraser and Skeena rivers, as well as for the west coast of Vancouver Island.

 This forecast calls for another very poor return of Fraser sockeye next year, totaling about 2 million fish.

 In fact, the DFO now suggests that all three Fraser fishery stakeholders -- the commercial sector and recreational and aboriginal groups -- will likely be significantly impacted next summer and that there may even be a total shutdown on the Fraser to preserve declining salmon stocks.

 For his part, Angelo sees the DFO forecast as a reinforcement of the conservation council report's warnings about fish-habitat destruction on the lower Fraser.

 "We know that the changing ocean environment is one reason for salmon declines, but river habitat is the other key part for salmon survival," he says. "And protecting that river habitat on the Fraser will be a key to building future salmon runs."

 The report's key recommendation is the setting-up of a multi-stakeholder task force to create an action plan of immediate measures to halt the losses to the river's ecosystems.

And Angelo says "immediate" measures are needed because we're running out of time quickly. – Vancouver Province

Learning Lake Erie lesson in the Pacific Northwest

From the time I was 3 years old until I was 15, I spent summers at Lake Erie. When I was little my father and brother used to come in with stringers loaded with fish — perch, yellow walleyes and blue pike.

 I remember as a little girl swimming in crystal clear water, chasing minnows and collecting seashells, tadpoles, frogs and other aquatic wildlife.

 As I got older, I witnessed the extinction of the blue pike, the disappearance of the minnows and the fouling of our beaches with putrid stuff that washed up after every storm. At the time, I didn’t understand why this was happening.

 Luckily, the people who had a personal or commercial interest in the health of Lake Erie banded together with responsible governments — local, state, national and international — to identify and address the multiple causes of the problem. The solutions involve not only managing the fishery, but also managing the entire drainage basin.

 So what does this have to do with Oregon?

 I propose that the idea to establishing marine reserves off the Oregon Coast is little more than a misguided diversion to avoid the fundamental problems created by abuse of our environment. Certainly, fisheries management is part of a solution, but we’re already doing that.

 What we aren’t doing, at least at the needed level, is managing the Columbia River Basin, a vast area that includes parts of Canada, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, most of Washington and Oregon, and all of Idaho — 260,000 square miles.

 Consider all of the industrial, agricultural and human pollutants from this area that are being flushed out the mouth of the Columbia River and washed by ocean currents down the Oregon Coast.

 Establishing marine reserves in Oregon’s ocean would certainly be politically expedient. But it would do nothing to solve our problem.

 After all, it’s easy to sell the idea of creating underwater Yellowstone Parks. But it’s not so easy to sell the idea of paying for new sewers or forcing industries and farmers and cities in the Columbia Basin to clean up their act. In the long term, expending taxpayer dollars to establish marine reserves while diverting those moneys away from solving the basic problems would be fool’s errand. In 20 years, who will need empty marine reserves?

 The Lake Erie experience offers a good model for dealing with our situation. Let’s fix the problem. Let’s commit ourselves to the hard task of cleaning up our environment. – Pat Sherman is mayor of Brookings, writing in the Eugene Register-Guard

<<•>>

Friday, December 7. 2007

 Managers recommend big dip in pollock, cod catch

The Bering Sea fishing industry is bracing for a deep cut in the annual catch limit for pollock, a bug-eyed, bottom-dwelling whitefish used for products including Gorton's fish sticks, McDonald's Filet-O-Fish sandwiches and imitation crab legs.

 Fishery scientists on recommended a catch limit next year of no more than 1 million tons.

 That's a staggering amount of fish -- ranking pollock as one of the world's largest seafood hauls -- but it would be 28 percent less than last year, bringing the catch to its lowest level since 1999.

 That could cost the fishing industry tens of millions of dollars and drive up the cost of pollock goods.

 Government scientists and fishing industry players said a cut in the catch limit was anticipated and reflects a natural decline in the pollock population after several years of very high abundance.

 Environmental activists, however, see a more dire picture and suggest the catch limit should be cut even more to guard against potentially disastrous overfishing.

 Considering all sides is the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, an 11-member panel that helps regulate commercial fishing off Alaska. The council, with government, industry and other representatives from Alaska, Washington and Oregon, is meeting all week at the Anchorage Hilton hotel and will recommend a catch limit to the U.S. commerce secretary, who has the final say.

 James Ianelli, a federal fisheries scientist from Seattle, said the Bering Sea pollock stock is basically healthy, though down from the highly abundant years seen earlier this decade when catches approached 1.5 million tons.

 Fishery regulators set strict catch limits and other safeguards to limit the number of fishing boats and prevent overfishing, Ianelli said.

 "That's what distinguishes Alaska from the rest of the world," he said.

 John Bundy, a council member and part owner of Glacier Fish Co., which operates two Bering Sea pollock fishing ships, said a cut in the catch limit is a prudent step that will hurt financially.

 "It affects our crews, it affects their families, it affects the companies," he said. "But in general, everybody will weather the storm."

 Brent Paine, who heads a trade association of boats that fish with trawl nets, estimated the industry could suffer a $150 million setback next year if the catch limit is cut to 1 million tons.

 "It's going to be a big hit," he said.

 But two factors could help offset the blow.

 First, the fleet can save expenses by using fewer boats to catch the fish, Paine said.

 Second, the price paid for raw pollock is likely to rise, though not enough to fully offset the cut in the catch limit, said Glenn Reed, president of the Pacific Seafood Processors Association.

 Jon Warrenchuk, ocean scientist for the conservation group Oceana, said global climate change coupled with other signs, such as an increase in "skinny" pollock and lower rates of baby pollock growing to adult size, suggest regulators aren't considering a deep enough cut in the catch limit.

 "There's less pollock out there," he said. "If people really wanted to be risk-averse and prevent catastrophe, they'd cut it further."

 One fishing boat owner, Fred Yeck of Oregon, said in a letter to the council he wants a cut in the catch limit of at least 25 percent and "even further in years to come" because of increasing difficulty finding pollock even when his boat ranges hundreds of miles out of Dutch Harbor, hub of the Bering Sea fishing industry.

 Ianelli said one trend is that pollock, especially younger fish, are living farther north and west during the summer, something seen before in the mid-1970s and the late 1980s.

 The council isn't expected to vote on the catch limit until perhaps Sunday. The Bering Sea pollock fishing season opens in late January. – Anchorage Daily News

Former council chairwoman to run for Legislature

Stephanie Madsen, a Juneau resident and head of a trade association of Bering Sea fishing ships, is running for the Alaska Legislature.

 Madsen, 53, on Monday filed her letter of intent with the state Division of Elections. Filing now allows her to begin raising money for the 2008 campaign.

 She’ll run as a Republican for the District 4 seat now held by Rep. Andrea Doll, D-Juneau. Doll was first elected to the House in 2006.

 Madsen is executive director of the At-sea Processors Association, whose members operate Seattle-based factory trawlers fishing for pollock and other fish in the Bering Sea.

 Previously, she worked for the Pacific Seafood Processors Association.

 Madsen has experience with both city and fish politics. For nine years, until 1993, she served on the Unalaska City Council.

 More recently, she chaired the North Pacific Fishery Management Council.

 Madsen said she’s been living in Juneau since 1999 and always thought about pursuing public office again.

 For now, she said she plans to do a lot of listening to sound out the issues of greatest concern to voters. One thing she’s personally interested in, other than fisheries, is roads and access in this enormous and largely inaccessible state.

 If elected, Madsen said she believes she can continue in her job with the At-sea Processors Association. It’s a job that’s focused on federal fish policy, not state, she said. – Anchorage Daily News

More catchable herring, but who will catch them?

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has released catch limits for the state’s two most important herring fisheries – Sitka Sound and Togiak.

 The department announced a limit of 13,796 tons for next spring’s sac roe fishery at Sitka Sound. That’s a big jump from last season’s 11,904 tons.

 The Togiak sac roe limit is 22,881 tons, down slightly from last season’s 23,634 tons.

Last season the Sitka herring fishery paid nearly $5.4 million at the docks, while the Togiak harvest paid a very poor $1.9 million.

 Herring, of course, are valued more for their roe, or eggs, than meat. Asian buyers take most of the roe.

 But in recent years, herring roe fisheries along the West Coast have left some quota still swimming for lack of buyers.

Russians to change seafood marketing

VLADIVOSTOK – Next year Russia plans to create five innovative seafood markets where fishery companies will be able to sell their products to all interested parties via a centralized database.

By June of 2008, the Russian government is to introduce a law regulating the activities of the so-called ‘fish exchange markets,’ head of the State Fishery department Andrei Krainy announced at a meeting in Kaliningrad.

The port cities of Kaliningrad, Murmansk, Vladivostok, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky may become spots for creating the seafood markets.

According to Krainy, fishery companies will be able to choose whether they want to sell their goods on their own to individual customers or use a centralized database for sales. Judging by foreign companies’ experience, they would normally sell 80 percent of their products to their own clients and 20 percent goes to the seafood markets.

Krainy also stressed that all seafood exports will be executed via the new markets. – Vladivostok News

A whale of a problem in Dutch Harbor

UNALASKA – Dead whales don't fall on most airports' lists of air traffic hazards, but one that washed up near Dutch Harbor on Monday was an exception.

Local harbor officers pulled a dead whale loose from the shore at the north end of the Unalaska Airport's runway. The rotting marine mammal had been attracting upwards of a hundred seabirds to the end of the runway, which was making it difficult for planes to take off.

Harbor officer Tim Mahoney, who helped tow the whale out to sea with the city's rescue boat, said the whale looked like it could have been a minke or maybe a humpback whale, but its level of decomposition made it hard to tell. He said it was about 30 feet long, but that that was an approximate measurement.

"We didn't actually throw a tape to it," he said. "It was pretty stinky."

The whale washed up Monday and got caught on the cement objects, called dolos, that form the breakwater at the end of the runway. Seas were rough at the time, and the first effort by harbor officers to pry the whale free failed.

But with calmer waters, they were able to get the dead animal loose and tow it out to the waters off of Ulakta Head, outside of the harbor, where Mahoney said it's still floating.

"There's plenty of fresh bait floating around out there if anyone wants to bait their pots," he said. "Just look for the big white spot."

The last time a whale washed up here, in September, local marine biologist Reid Brewer took samples and measurements of the humpback before sinking the whale near Eider Point. But Brewer is out of town right now, so this whale has gone unexamined. Mahoney said that the port office got approval from the National Marine Fisheries Service office in Kodiak to dump the whale at sea, and that time was of the essence.

"With the birds the way they were, we were at the point where we were going to lose the airport for traffic," he said. "So they gave us permission to tow it off the beach."

There's been some speculation that the whale may be the same humpback that turned up in September. From the pictures available, Monday's whale appears smaller, but it's not clear enough to say for sure. – KIAL